PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KER.PA vs. MC.PA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


KER.PAMC.PA
YTD Return-11.41%8.97%
1Y Return-35.90%-8.55%
3Y Return (Ann)-19.06%9.58%
5Y Return (Ann)-6.01%19.66%
10Y Return (Ann)10.66%21.57%
Sharpe Ratio-1.21-0.28
Daily Std Dev28.83%27.31%
Max Drawdown-85.03%-70.25%
Current Drawdown-53.23%-9.97%

Fundamentals


KER.PAMC.PA
Market Cap€40.85B€394.14B
EPS€24.37€30.35
PE Ratio13.6425.98
PEG Ratio2.532.58
Revenue (TTM)€19.57B€86.15B
Gross Profit (TTM)€15.20B€54.20B
EBITDA (TTM)€5.60B€25.27B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between KER.PA and MC.PA is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

KER.PA vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, KER.PA achieves a -11.41% return, which is significantly lower than MC.PA's 8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, KER.PA has underperformed MC.PA with an annualized return of 10.66%, while MC.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 21.57% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%8,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4,391.00%
6,992.46%
KER.PA
MC.PA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Kering SA

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KER.PA vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kering SA (KER.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KER.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KER.PA, currently valued at -1.13, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-1.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KER.PA, currently valued at -1.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KER.PA, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.80
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KER.PA, currently valued at -0.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KER.PA, currently valued at -1.41, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.41
MC.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.98
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.42, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.42

KER.PA vs. MC.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KER.PA Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is lower than the MC.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of KER.PA and MC.PA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.13
-0.25
KER.PA
MC.PA

Dividends

KER.PA vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison

KER.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than MC.PA's 1.64% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
KER.PA
Kering SA
4.13%3.51%2.52%1.13%1.35%1.79%1.42%1.17%1.88%2.53%2.35%2.43%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
1.64%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%3.58%2.26%

Drawdowns

KER.PA vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KER.PA drawdown since its inception was -85.03%, which is greater than MC.PA's maximum drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KER.PA and MC.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-56.93%
-13.02%
KER.PA
MC.PA

Volatility

KER.PA vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison

Kering SA (KER.PA) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) at 6.36%. This indicates that KER.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.89%
6.36%
KER.PA
MC.PA

Financials

KER.PA vs. MC.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kering SA and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in EUR except per share items