ABX.TO vs. ATYM.L
ABX.TO (Barrick Gold Corporation) and ATYM.L (Atalaya Mining Ltd) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — ABX.TO in Gold, ATYM.L in Copper. Over the past 10 years, ABX.TO returned 8.78%/yr vs 25.61%/yr for ATYM.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABX.TO vs. ATYM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ABX.TO is traded in CAD, while ATYM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ATYM.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABX.TO achieves a -11.68% return, which is significantly lower than ATYM.L's -2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ABX.TO has underperformed ATYM.L with an annualized return of 8.78%, while ATYM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.61% annualized return.
ABX.TO
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -11.46%
- YTD
- -11.68%
- 6M
- -12.84%
- 1Y
- 88.14%
- 3Y*
- 35.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
ATYM.L
- 1D
- 4.13%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- 1Y
- 82.35%
- 3Y*
- 44.16%
- 5Y*
- 27.64%
- 10Y*
- 25.61%
ABX.TO vs. ATYM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABX.TO Barrick Gold Corporation | -11.68% | 173.89% | -4.69% | 5.66% | 1.61% | -13.98% | 21.72% | 31.81% | 2.15% | -14.89% |
ATYM.L Atalaya Mining Ltd | -2.46% | 147.40% | 7.65% | 14.83% | -22.87% | 87.12% | 23.15% | -8.60% | 29.85% | 38.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABX.TO and ATYM.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, ABX.TO and ATYM.L have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ABX.TO:
CA$87.35B
ATYM.L:
£1.27B
ABX.TO:
$3.61
ATYM.L:
€0.55
ABX.TO:
10.15
ATYM.L:
17.13
ABX.TO:
0.12
ATYM.L:
0.82
ABX.TO:
3.25
ATYM.L:
3.02
ABX.TO:
2.25
ATYM.L:
1.93
ABX.TO:
$19.02B
ATYM.L:
€473.55M
ABX.TO:
$10.15B
ATYM.L:
€148.66M
ABX.TO:
$12.44B
ATYM.L:
€170.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABX.TO vs. ATYM.L — Risk / Return Rank
ABX.TO
ATYM.L
ABX.TO vs. ATYM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) and Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABX.TO | ATYM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.12 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | 5.07 | +1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABX.TO vs. ATYM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABX.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.64%, smaller than the maximum ATYM.L drawdown of -92.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABX.TO and ATYM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABX.TO | ATYM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.64% | -92.90% | +8.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.49% | -38.68% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.49% | -38.68% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.11% | -63.26% | +20.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.74% | -68.54% | +11.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.51% | -24.62% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -68.70% | +28.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.52% | 16.19% | -3.67% |
Volatility
ABX.TO vs. ATYM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) is 15.15%, while Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) has a volatility of 16.35%. This indicates that ABX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATYM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABX.TO | ATYM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.15% | 16.35% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.57% | 40.20% | -4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.59% | 47.12% | -1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.80% | 41.85% | -7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.89% | 41.02% | -5.13% |
Dividends
ABX.TO vs. ATYM.L - Dividend Comparison
ABX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than ATYM.L's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABX.TO Barrick Gold Corporation | 2.42% | 1.22% | 2.46% | 2.27% | 5.06% | 3.96% | 1.33% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.72% | 0.47% | 1.43% |
ATYM.L Atalaya Mining Ltd | 0.75% | 0.71% | 1.71% | 1.91% | 0.91% | 7.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ABX.TO vs. ATYM.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barrick Gold Corporation and Atalaya Mining Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ABX.TO vs. ATYM.L - Profitability Comparison
ABX.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.97B and revenue of 5.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.
ATYM.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported a gross profit of 43.43M and revenue of 120.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.
ABX.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.7%.
ATYM.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported an operating income of 37.65M and revenue of 120.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.2%.
ABX.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.
ATYM.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported a net income of 28.39M and revenue of 120.87M, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABX.TO and ATYM.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ABX.TO and ATYM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer