PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABR vs. RWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABR vs. RWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) and Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABR achieves a -28.48% return, which is significantly lower than RWT's -3.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ABR has outperformed RWT with an annualized return of 7.94%, while RWT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.16% annualized return.


ABR

1D
1.96%
1M
-7.37%
YTD
-28.48%
6M
-30.37%
1Y
-42.45%
3Y*
-18.47%
5Y*
-12.08%
10Y*
7.94%

RWT

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-3.53%
6M
-4.87%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
-6.67%
10Y*
-1.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABR vs. RWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
-28.48%-36.65%3.16%29.73%-20.73%39.42%10.04%55.19%30.04%26.60%
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
-3.53%-4.08%-2.60%21.61%-42.26%60.13%-42.70%18.16%9.40%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ABR and RWT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2004

0.43

The correlation between ABR and RWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ABR:

$0.57

RWT:

-$0.48

PS Ratio

ABR:

1.17

RWT:

2.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABR:

$940.70M

RWT:

$269.15M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABR:

$829.57M

RWT:

$1.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABR:

$878.83M

RWT:

$1.06B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABR vs. RWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABR
ABR Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ABR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ABR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

RWT
RWT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABR vs. RWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) and Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABRRWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.06

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

0.22

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

0.44

-1.90

ABR vs. RWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABR Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the RWT Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABR and RWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABR vs. RWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABR drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, which is greater than RWT's maximum drawdown of -88.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABR and RWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABRRWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.76%

-88.91%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.82%

-21.22%

-33.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.55%

-33.79%

-25.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.55%

-55.83%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.76%

-85.40%

+12.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.76%

-59.40%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.88%

-45.59%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.02%

10.58%

+18.44%

Volatility

ABR vs. RWT - Volatility Comparison

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) at 7.87%. This indicates that ABR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABRRWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.50%

7.87%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.80%

29.25%

+4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.31%

36.13%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.13%

35.10%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.46%

49.05%

-8.59%

Dividends

ABR vs. RWT - Dividend Comparison

ABR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.58%, more than RWT's 13.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
20.58%17.14%12.42%11.07%11.68%7.53%8.67%7.94%11.22%8.33%8.31%8.11%
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
13.95%13.02%10.26%9.58%13.61%5.91%8.26%7.26%7.83%7.56%7.36%8.48%

Financials

ABR vs. RWT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Redwood Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
25.74M
87.30M
(ABR) Total Revenue
(RWT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ABR and RWT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABR has higher volatility (11.50%) compared to RWT (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABR dropped -97.76% vs RWT's -88.91%.

RWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABR and RWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer