PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABLOX vs. BLNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABLOX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Balanced Portfolio Fund (ABLOX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLOX achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 13.05% return.


ABLOX

1D
-0.48%
1M
0.32%
6M
8.15%
YTD
9.97%
1Y
20.62%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
10.65%

BLNDX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.65%
6M
9.07%
YTD
13.05%
1Y
26.46%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLOX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ABLOX
Alger Balanced Portfolio Fund
9.97%16.03%17.06%17.44%-11.40%19.17%10.23%0.13%
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
13.05%4.12%13.11%5.79%3.71%20.16%16.30%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLOX and BLNDX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.65

The correlation between ABLOX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABLOX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLOX
ABLOX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ABLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ABLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNDX
BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLOX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Balanced Portfolio Fund (ABLOX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABLOXBLNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.66

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.77

12.40

+2.37

ABLOX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLOX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABLOX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLOX drawdown since its inception was -43.31%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLOX and BLNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABLOXBLNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.31%

-17.69%

-25.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-7.24%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-17.69%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.34%

-17.69%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-4.62%

+3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-3.21%

-3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.13%

-0.73%

Volatility

ABLOX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Balanced Portfolio Fund (ABLOX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) have volatilities of 3.21% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABLOXBLNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.36%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.83%

9.86%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

12.99%

-3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

11.72%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.91%

11.77%

+0.14%

ABLOX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLOX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABLOX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

ABLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.47%, more than BLNDX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABLOX
Alger Balanced Portfolio Fund
12.47%13.72%0.18%1.72%5.99%3.65%1.55%3.95%21.77%2.83%0.00%2.12%
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
0.65%0.73%5.74%3.71%2.67%6.11%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABLOX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLNDX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to ABLOX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLOX dropped -43.31% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

ABLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABLOX and BLNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer