ABLD vs. TMVE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ABLD (Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF) and TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - ABLD tracks the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index while TMVE tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ABLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMVE.

Performance

ABLD vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than TMVE's 18.65% return.

ABLD

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 3.74%
• 6M: 1.27%
• YTD: 9.19%
• 1Y: 13.37%
• 3Y*: 10.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.46%

TMVE

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 12.50%
• YTD: 18.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	$251.36K	$270.10K	$369.63K
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF	$144.58K	$91.35K	$550.80K

ABLD vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	9.19%	0.63%
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF	18.65%	6.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLD and TMVE is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

ABLD vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABLD

ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 33
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 34
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 29

TMVE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABLD vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABLD	TMVE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.67	—	—

Drawdowns

ABLD vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and TMVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLD	TMVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-8.21%	-11.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.80%	-0.63%	-6.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-1.35%	-2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ABLD	TMVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.74%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.96%	13.19%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.35%	13.19%	+4.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	13.19%	+4.16%

ABLD vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABLD vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison

ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	3.52%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF	0.10%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABLD and TMVE in my portfolio?

ABLD and TMVE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ABLD or TMVE?

On fees, ABLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABLD or TMVE?

ABLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMVE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABLD or TMVE?

ABLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.

What is the main difference between ABLD and TMVE?

ABLD tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index, while TMVE tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLD and 0.55% for TMVE.