ABHY vs. ABXB
ABHY (Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF) and ABXB (Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds from Abacus. ABHY is actively managed, while ABXB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ABHY returned 1.12%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for ABXB. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ABHY charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for ABXB.
Performance
ABHY vs. ABXB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with ABHY at 0.19% and ABXB at 0.19%.
ABHY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
ABXB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
ABHY vs. ABXB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABHY Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF | 0.19% | 8.73% | 4.69% | 7.79% | -14.49% | 1.30% | 0.87% |
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF | 0.19% | 8.73% | 4.69% | 7.79% | -14.49% | 1.30% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABHY and ABXB is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 1.00 |
The correlation between ABHY and ABXB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABHY vs. ABXB — Risk / Return Rank
ABHY
ABXB
ABHY vs. ABXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABHY | ABXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 1.54 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 2.18 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.56 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 5.28 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABHY | ABXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.54 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
ABHY vs. ABXB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABHY drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, roughly equal to the maximum ABXB drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABHY and ABXB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABHY | ABXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -16.96% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -3.43% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.81% | -3.81% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | -16.96% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -1.60% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -5.73% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 1.01% | 0.00% |
Volatility
ABHY vs. ABXB - Volatility Comparison
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB) have volatilities of 0.98% and 0.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABHY | ABXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 2.74% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48% | 3.48% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 5.59% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.44% | 5.44% | 0.00% |
ABHY vs. ABXB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABHY has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than ABXB's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABHY vs. ABXB - Dividend Comparison
ABHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, which matches ABXB's 5.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABHY Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF | 5.20% | 5.50% | 15.35% | 4.79% | 3.18% | 3.40% | 0.37% |
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF | 5.20% | 5.50% | 15.35% | 4.79% | 3.18% | 3.40% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ABHY and ABXB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ABXB has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to ABHY (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABHY dropped -16.96% vs ABXB's -16.96%.
On 5-year performance, ABXB leads with 1.12% vs 1.12% for ABHY. On fees, ABXB is cheaper at 0.62% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ABXB has performed better with a 1.12% return vs 1.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ABXB is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for ABHY.
ABHY and ABXB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 5.20%.
Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ABHY and 0.62% for ABXB.
ABXB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABHY and ABXB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer