ABXB vs. FTBD
ABXB (Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF) and FTBD (Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. ABXB is passively managed, while FTBD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ABXB returned 6.52%/yr vs 5.14%/yr for FTBD. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABXB charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FTBD.
Performance
ABXB vs. FTBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABXB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than FTBD's 1.17% return.
ABXB
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 5.87%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- —
FTBD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 6.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABXB vs. FTBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF | 0.50% | 8.73% | 4.69% | 4.92% |
FTBD Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF | 1.17% | 8.35% | 1.77% | 3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABXB and FTBD is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2023 | 0.77 |
The correlation between ABXB and FTBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABXB vs. FTBD — Risk / Return Rank
ABXB
FTBD
ABXB vs. FTBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB) and Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABXB | FTBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 1.55 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 2.28 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 2.18 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | 7.52 | -1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABXB | FTBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.55 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.76 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
ABXB vs. FTBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABXB drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, which is greater than FTBD's maximum drawdown of -6.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABXB and FTBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABXB | FTBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -6.98% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -2.98% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.81% | -6.56% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -0.98% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -1.57% | -4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.86% | +0.15% |
Volatility
ABXB vs. FTBD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB) is 0.97%, while Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that ABXB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABXB | FTBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 1.52% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 3.18% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46% | 4.32% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 5.87% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.44% | 5.87% | -0.43% |
ABXB vs. FTBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABXB has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FTBD's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABXB vs. FTBD - Dividend Comparison
ABXB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than FTBD's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF | 5.18% | 5.50% | 15.35% | 4.79% | 3.18% | 3.40% | 0.37% |
FTBD Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF | 5.03% | 5.04% | 4.76% | 4.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABXB and FTBD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTBD has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to ABXB (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABXB dropped -16.96% vs FTBD's -6.98%.
On 3-year performance, ABXB leads with 6.52% vs 5.14% for FTBD. On fees, FTBD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ABXB has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ABXB has performed better with a 6.52% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTBD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for ABXB.
ABXB has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 5.03% for FTBD.
They also come from different issuers: Abacus and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for ABXB and 0.55% for FTBD.
ABXB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABXB and FTBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer