ABHY vs. ABLS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ABHY (Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF) and ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABHY is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Abacus, while ABLS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index. ABHY is actively managed, while ABLS is passively managed. Over the past year, ABHY returned 5.34% vs 0.04% for ABLS. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABHY charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ABLS.

Performance

ABHY vs. ABLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABHY achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than ABLS's 2.75% return.

ABHY

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 0.47%
• 1Y: 5.34%
• 3Y*: 6.41%
• 5Y*: 1.12%
• 10Y*: —

ABLS

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: -0.23%
• 1Y: 0.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABHY vs. ABLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABHY Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF	0.19%	7.73%
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	2.75%	-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ABHY and ABLS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

ABHY vs. ABLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABHY

ABHY Risk / Return Rank: 40
ABHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
ABHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ABHY Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ABHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ABHY Martin Ratio Rank: 35

ABLS

ABLS Risk / Return Rank: 9
ABLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABHY vs. ABLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABHY	ABLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	0.00	+1.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	0.13	+2.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.01	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	0.00	+1.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.28	0.01	+5.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABHY vs. ABLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the ABLS Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABHY and ABLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABHY	ABLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	0.00	+1.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	-0.23	+0.47

Drawdowns

ABHY vs. ABLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABHY drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, smaller than the maximum ABLS drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABHY and ABLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABHY	ABLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.96%	-19.28%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.43%	-16.19%	+12.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-6.21%	+4.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-8.45%	+2.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	5.82%	-4.81%

Volatility

ABHY vs. ABLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) is 0.98%, while Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that ABHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABHY	ABLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	3.80%	-2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.74%	12.68%	-9.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48%	17.35%	-13.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.59%	21.25%	-15.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.44%	21.25%	-15.81%

ABHY vs. ABLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABHY has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLS's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABHY vs. ABLS - Dividend Comparison

ABHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, less than ABLS's 13.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABHY Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF	5.20%	5.50%	15.35%	4.79%	3.18%	3.40%	0.37%
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	13.68%	14.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABHY and ABLS in my portfolio?

ABHY and ABLS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABHY or ABLS?

ABLS has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to ABHY (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABHY dropped -16.96% vs ABLS's -19.28%.

Which ETF is better, ABHY or ABLS?

On 1-year performance, ABHY leads with 5.34% vs 0.04% for ABLS. On fees, ABLS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ABHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABHY or ABLS?

Over the 1-year period, ABHY has performed better with a 5.34% return vs 0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABHY or ABLS?

ABLS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for ABHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABHY or ABLS?

ABLS has the higher dividend yield at 13.68%, compared with 5.20% for ABHY.

What is the main difference between ABHY and ABLS?

ABHY is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while ABLS is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ABHY and 0.39% for ABLS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.