PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABLS vs. SMCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABLS vs. SMCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period


ABLS

1D
2.19%
1M
9.45%
YTD
-0.96%
6M
-1.56%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMCP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLS vs. SMCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABLS vs. SMCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLS
ABLS Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ABLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABLS Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ABLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABLS Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLS vs. SMCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABLSSMCPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.90

ABLS vs. SMCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABLSSMCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

Drawdowns

ABLS vs. SMCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLS drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, which is greater than SMCP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLS and SMCP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABLSSMCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.28%

0.00%

-19.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.60%

0.00%

-9.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

0.00%

-8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

Volatility

ABLS vs. SMCP - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABLSSMCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.97%

0.00%

+17.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

0.00%

+21.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

0.00%

+21.87%

ABLS vs. SMCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABLS vs. SMCP - Dividend Comparison

ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.19%, while SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders.