ABLS vs. SMCP
ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) and SMCP (AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds — ABLS tracks the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index while SMCP tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. ABLS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SMCP.
Performance
ABLS vs. SMCP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
ABLS
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABLS vs. SMCP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | 2.22% |
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABLS vs. SMCP — Risk / Return Rank
ABLS
SMCP
ABLS vs. SMCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABLS | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABLS | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ABLS vs. SMCP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABLS drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, which is greater than SMCP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLS and SMCP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABLS | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | 0.00% | -19.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.60% | 0.00% | -9.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | 0.00% | -8.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | — | — |
Volatility
ABLS vs. SMCP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABLS | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.97% | 0.00% | +17.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 0.00% | +21.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 0.00% | +21.87% |
ABLS vs. SMCP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABLS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABLS vs. SMCP - Dividend Comparison
ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.19%, while SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | 14.19% | 14.04% |
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |