ABG vs. AAPL
ABG (Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. ABG operates in Auto & Truck Dealerships (Consumer Cyclical), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ABG returned 15.28%/yr vs 29.23%/yr for AAPL. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ABG vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABG achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 13.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ABG has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 15.28%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.23% annualized return.
ABG
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 12.80%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 0.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.20%
AAPL
- 1D
- -7.35%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 16.79%
- 10Y*
- 29.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | $19.18B | $17.68B | $17.20B |
| $73.30M | $60.04M | $54.50M |
ABG vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABG Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. | -0.36% | -4.32% | 8.03% | 25.51% | 3.77% | 18.52% | 30.37% | 67.70% | 4.16% | 3.73% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 13.84% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABG and AAPL is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2002 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
ABG:
$4.31B
AAPL:
$4.54T
ABG:
$14.28
AAPL:
$8.69
ABG:
16.22
AAPL:
35.54
ABG:
2.77
AAPL:
4.68
ABG:
0.35
AAPL:
9.82
ABG:
$9.61B
AAPL:
$466.82B
ABG:
$1.60B
AAPL:
$227.12B
ABG:
$790.50M
AAPL:
$168.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABG vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
ABG
AAPL
ABG vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABG | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.35 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 3.60 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 8.56 | -8.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABG vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABG drawdown since its inception was -92.76%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABG and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABG | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.76% | -81.80% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.94% | -13.80% | -18.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.37% | -33.36% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.37% | -33.36% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.68% | -38.52% | -27.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.25% | -9.17% | -15.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.32% | -29.52% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.04% | 5.79% | +10.25% |
Volatility
ABG vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) has a higher volatility of 13.69% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 11.52%. This indicates that ABG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABG | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.69% | 11.52% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.91% | 20.71% | +4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.73% | 25.91% | +6.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.04% | 28.02% | +12.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.49% | 29.12% | +12.37% |
Dividends
ABG vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
ABG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
ABG Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ABG vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ABG vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
ABG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of -726.80M and revenue of -3.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.3%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.77B and revenue of 109.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.
ABG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 203.70M and revenue of -3.98B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.1%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.70B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.6%.
ABG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a net income of -187.80M and revenue of -3.98B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.79B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABG and AAPL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABG has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to AAPL (11.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABG dropped -92.76% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABG and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer