PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABG vs. AN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABG vs. AN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and AutoNation, Inc. (AN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABG achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than AN's 2.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ABG having a 15.28% annualized return and AN not far ahead at 15.86%.


ABG

1D
-0.62%
1M
12.80%
6M
-1.20%
YTD
-0.36%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
0.91%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
15.28%
ALL TIME*
12.20%

AN

1D
-1.05%
1M
13.94%
6M
3.62%
YTD
2.87%
1Y
11.45%
3Y*
9.91%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
15.86%
ALL TIME*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$73.30M$60.04M$54.50M
$113.00M$95.08M$79.99M

ABG vs. AN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
-0.36%-4.32%8.03%25.51%3.77%18.52%30.37%67.70%4.16%3.73%
AN
AutoNation, Inc.
2.87%21.57%13.09%39.96%-8.17%67.43%43.51%36.22%-30.45%5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ABG and AN is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2002

0.62

The correlation between ABG and AN shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABG:

$4.31B

AN:

$7.11B

EPS

ABG:

$14.28

AN:

$20.57

PE Ratio

ABG:

16.22

AN:

10.32

PEG Ratio

ABG:

2.77

AN:

28.10

PS Ratio

ABG:

0.35

AN:

0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABG:

$9.61B

AN:

$27.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABG:

$1.60B

AN:

$4.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABG:

$790.50M

AN:

$1.41B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABG vs. AN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABG
ABG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ABG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ABG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

AN
AN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AN Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABG vs. AN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and AutoNation, Inc. (AN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABGANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.08

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

0.48

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

0.93

-0.66

ABG vs. AN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABG Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the AN Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABG and AN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABG vs. AN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABG drawdown since its inception was -92.76%, roughly equal to the maximum AN drawdown of -90.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABG and AN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABGANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.76%

-90.15%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.94%

-21.39%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.37%

-21.39%

-20.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.37%

-29.54%

-12.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.68%

-63.63%

-2.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.25%

-7.64%

-16.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.32%

-38.56%

+12.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.04%

11.04%

+5.00%

Volatility

ABG vs. AN - Volatility Comparison

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) has a higher volatility of 13.69% compared to AutoNation, Inc. (AN) at 12.69%. This indicates that ABG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABGANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.69%

12.69%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.91%

23.54%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.73%

29.65%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.04%

36.05%

+3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.49%

37.13%

+4.36%

Dividends

ABG vs. AN - Dividend Comparison

Neither ABG nor AN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ABG vs. AN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. and AutoNation, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ABG vs. AN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. and AutoNation, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ABG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of -726.80M and revenue of -3.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.3%.

AN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 6.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.7%.

ABG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 203.70M and revenue of -3.98B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.1%.

AN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported an operating income of 318.00M and revenue of 6.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.

ABG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a net income of -187.80M and revenue of -3.98B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

AN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported a net income of 147.00M and revenue of 6.93B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ABG and AN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABG has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to AN (12.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABG dropped -92.76% vs AN's -90.15%.

AN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABG and AN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer