ABG vs. ULTA
Compare and contrast key facts about Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ABG or ULTA.
Key characteristics
| ABG | ULTA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -4.99% | -18.90% |
| 1Y Return | 12.85% | -22.69% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.33% | 7.41% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 21.60% | 3.05% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 13.29% | 16.36% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.32 | -0.74 |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.80% | 32.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -92.76% | -87.89% |
| Current Drawdown | -14.91% | -29.94% |
Fundamentals
| ABG | ULTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.48B | $19.62B |
| EPS | $27.59 | $26.05 |
| PE Ratio | 8.05 | 15.60 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.48 | 1.67 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.42B | $11.21B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $3.10B | $4.04B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.13B | $1.92B |
Correlation
The correlation between ABG and ULTA is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ABG vs. ULTA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ABG achieves a -4.99% return, which is significantly higher than ULTA's -18.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ABG has underperformed ULTA with an annualized return of 13.29%, while ULTA has yielded a comparatively higher 16.36% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ABG vs. ULTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ABG vs. ULTA - Dividend Comparison
Neither ABG nor ULTA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ABG vs. ULTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABG drawdown since its inception was -92.76%, which is greater than ULTA's maximum drawdown of -87.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABG and ULTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ABG vs. ULTA - Volatility Comparison
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) at 5.32%. This indicates that ABG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ABG vs. ULTA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities