PortfoliosLab logo
ABG vs. ULTA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ABG and ULTA is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ABG vs. ULTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ABG:

-0.07

ULTA:

0.05

Sortino Ratio

ABG:

0.27

ULTA:

0.39

Omega Ratio

ABG:

1.03

ULTA:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

ABG:

-0.02

ULTA:

0.04

Martin Ratio

ABG:

-0.03

ULTA:

0.16

Ulcer Index

ABG:

14.51%

ULTA:

12.06%

Daily Std Dev

ABG:

38.55%

ULTA:

38.80%

Max Drawdown

ABG:

-92.76%

ULTA:

-87.89%

Current Drawdown

ABG:

-23.60%

ULTA:

-27.41%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABG:

$4.71B

ULTA:

$18.57B

EPS

ABG:

$20.60

ULTA:

$25.35

PE Ratio

ABG:

11.42

ULTA:

16.23

PEG Ratio

ABG:

0.74

ULTA:

2.32

PS Ratio

ABG:

0.28

ULTA:

1.64

PB Ratio

ABG:

1.30

ULTA:

7.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABG:

$17.14B

ULTA:

$8.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABG:

$2.90B

ULTA:

$3.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABG:

$877.90M

ULTA:

$1.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABG achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly higher than ULTA's -5.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ABG having a 10.43% annualized return and ULTA not far ahead at 10.54%.


ABG

YTD

-3.85%

1M

5.19%

6M

-10.68%

1Y

-2.52%

5Y*

30.37%

10Y*

10.43%

ULTA

YTD

-5.33%

1M

14.98%

6M

7.57%

1Y

2.06%

5Y*

15.54%

10Y*

10.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABG vs. ULTA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABG is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABG is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABG is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABG is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABG is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABG is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ULTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ULTA is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ULTA is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ULTA is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ULTA is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ULTA is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ULTA is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ABG vs. ULTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ABG Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the ULTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABG and ULTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ABG vs. ULTA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ABG nor ULTA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ABG vs. ULTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABG drawdown since its inception was -92.76%, which is greater than ULTA's maximum drawdown of -87.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABG and ULTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ABG vs. ULTA - Volatility Comparison

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) has a higher volatility of 9.30% compared to Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) at 8.02%. This indicates that ABG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ABG vs. ULTA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
4.15B
3.49B
(ABG) Total Revenue
(ULTA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ABG vs. ULTA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
17.5%
38.2%
(ABG) Gross Margin
(ULTA) Gross Margin
ABG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 724.20M and revenue of 4.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.5%.

ULTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.33B and revenue of 3.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.

ABG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 234.30M and revenue of 4.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

ULTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 516.32M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.

ABG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a net income of 132.10M and revenue of 4.15B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.

ULTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 393.27M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.