ABG vs. ULTA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA).

Performance

ABG vs. ULTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ABG vs. ULTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABG Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.	-15.96%	-4.32%	8.03%	25.51%	3.77%	18.52%	30.37%	67.70%	4.16%	3.73%
ULTA Ulta Beauty, Inc.	-13.60%	39.11%	-11.24%	4.46%	13.76%	43.59%	13.44%	3.39%	9.47%	-12.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ABG : $3.79B ULTA : $23.27B
EPS ABG : $18.01 ULTA : $25.63
PE Ratio ABG : 10.85 ULTA : 20.40
PEG Ratio ABG : 0.40 ULTA : 2.03
PS Ratio ABG : 0.21 ULTA : 1.90
Total Revenue (TTM) ABG : $18.00B ULTA : $12.39B
Gross Profit (TTM) ABG : $3.07B ULTA : $4.85B
EBITDA (TTM) ABG : $938.40M ULTA : $1.76B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABG achieves a -15.96% return, which is significantly lower than ULTA's -13.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ABG has outperformed ULTA with an annualized return of 13.16%, while ULTA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.41% annualized return.

ABG

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -8.59%
• YTD: -15.96%
• 6M: -20.06%
• 1Y: -11.52%
• 3Y*: -2.37%
• 5Y*: -0.13%
• 10Y*: 13.16%

ULTA

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: -23.67%
• YTD: -13.60%
• 6M: -4.40%
• 1Y: 42.61%
• 3Y*: -1.42%
• 5Y*: 10.76%
• 10Y*: 10.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ABG vs. ULTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABG

ABG Risk / Return Rank: 27
ABG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ABG Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
ABG Omega Ratio Rank: 25
ABG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
ABG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

ULTA

ULTA Risk / Return Rank: 77
ULTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ULTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ULTA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ULTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ULTA Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABG vs. ULTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABG	ULTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	1.16	-1.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	1.80	-2.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.25	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	1.63	-1.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.87	6.25	-7.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABG vs. ULTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABG Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the ULTA Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABG and ULTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABG	ULTA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34	1.16	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.32	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.27	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.37	-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between ABG and ULTA is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ABG vs. ULTA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ABG nor ULTA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ABG vs. ULTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABG drawdown since its inception was -92.76%, which is greater than ULTA's maximum drawdown of -87.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABG and ULTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABG	ULTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.76%	-87.89%	-4.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.41%	-27.83%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.49%	-44.56%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.68%	-64.92%	-0.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.11%	-26.05%	-10.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.22%	-20.74%	-5.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.03%	7.26%	+4.77%

Volatility

ABG vs. ULTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) is 7.51%, while Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) has a volatility of 17.00%. This indicates that ABG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABG	ULTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.51%	17.00%	-9.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.79%	26.68%	-4.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.43%	37.09%	-2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.00%	34.22%	+5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.59%	38.29%	+3.30%

Financials

ABG vs. ULTA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ABG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.00M and revenue of 4.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.

ULTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.48B and revenue of 3.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.

ABG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.40M and revenue of 4.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

ULTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 464.68M and revenue of 3.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

ABG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a net income of 60.00M and revenue of 4.68B, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.

ULTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 356.68M and revenue of 3.90B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.