ABG vs. ULTA

In the year-to-date period, ABG achieves a -12.53% return, which is significantly higher than ULTA's -17.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ABG has outperformed ULTA with an annualized return of 9.64%, while ULTA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ABG Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is higher than the ULTA Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABG and ULTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ABG nor ULTA has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ABG drawdown since its inception was -92.76%, which is greater than ULTA's maximum drawdown of -87.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABG and ULTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) is 13.53%, while Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) has a volatility of 17.72%. This indicates that ABG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.