ABG vs. ULTA

In the year-to-date period, ABG achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than ULTA's -6.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ABG has outperformed ULTA with an annualized return of 13.26%, while ULTA has yielded a comparatively lower 12.15% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ABG Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the ULTA Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABG and ULTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ABG nor ULTA has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ABG drawdown since its inception was -92.76%, which is greater than ULTA's maximum drawdown of -87.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABG and ULTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) at 6.85%. This indicates that ABG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.