ABG vs. KLAC
ABG (Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.) and KLAC (KLA Corporation) are both stocks. ABG operates in Auto & Truck Dealerships (Consumer Cyclical), while KLAC operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ABG returned 15.28%/yr vs 39.77%/yr for KLAC. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ABG vs. KLAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABG achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than KLAC's 50.85% return. Over the past 10 years, ABG has underperformed KLAC with an annualized return of 15.28%, while KLAC has yielded a comparatively higher 39.77% annualized return.
ABG
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 12.80%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 0.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.20%
KLAC
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -22.39%
- 6M
- 28.36%
- YTD
- 50.85%
- 1Y
- 107.52%
- 3Y*
- 53.92%
- 5Y*
- 40.75%
- 10Y*
- 39.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $73.30M | $60.04M | $54.50M | |
KLAC KLA Corporation | $2.50B | $2.71B | $2.78B |
ABG vs. KLAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABG Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. | -0.36% | -4.32% | 8.03% | 25.51% | 3.77% | 18.52% | 30.37% | 67.70% | 4.16% | 3.73% |
KLAC KLA Corporation | 50.85% | 94.48% | 9.36% | 56.05% | -11.20% | 68.05% | 47.94% | 103.99% | -12.49% | 36.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABG and KLAC is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2002 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ABG and KLAC has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ABG:
$4.31B
KLAC:
$238.81B
ABG:
$14.28
KLAC:
$3.66
ABG:
16.22
KLAC:
49.92
ABG:
2.77
KLAC:
3.11
ABG:
0.35
KLAC:
17.76
ABG:
$9.61B
KLAC:
$13.58B
ABG:
$1.60B
KLAC:
$8.32B
ABG:
$790.50M
KLAC:
$6.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABG vs. KLAC — Risk / Return Rank
ABG
KLAC
ABG vs. KLAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABG | KLAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.31 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 2.52 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 9.80 | -9.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABG vs. KLAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABG drawdown since its inception was -92.76%, which is greater than KLAC's maximum drawdown of -83.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABG and KLAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABG | KLAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.76% | -83.74% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.94% | -43.59% | +11.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.37% | -43.59% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.37% | -43.59% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.68% | -43.59% | -22.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.25% | -39.41% | +15.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.32% | -29.29% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.04% | 11.20% | +4.84% |
Volatility
ABG vs. KLAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) is 13.69%, while KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a volatility of 22.35%. This indicates that ABG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABG | KLAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.69% | 22.35% | -8.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.91% | 51.87% | -26.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.73% | 59.59% | -26.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.04% | 46.07% | -6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.49% | 43.21% | -1.72% |
Dividends
ABG vs. KLAC - Dividend Comparison
ABG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABG Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KLAC KLA Corporation | 0.44% | 0.61% | 0.96% | 0.92% | 1.25% | 0.91% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 3.17% | 2.15% | 2.67% | 2.94% |
Financials
ABG vs. KLAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. and KLA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ABG vs. KLAC - Profitability Comparison
ABG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of -726.80M and revenue of -3.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.3%.
KLAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.24B and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.4%.
ABG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 203.70M and revenue of -3.98B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.1%.
KLAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.
ABG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a net income of -187.80M and revenue of -3.98B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
KLAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.36B and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 37.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABG and KLAC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KLAC has higher volatility (22.35%) compared to ABG (13.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABG dropped -92.76% vs KLAC's -83.74%.
KLAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABG and KLAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer