ABFL vs. SPTM
Compare and contrast key facts about Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM).
ABFL and SPTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ABFL is an actively managed fund by Abacus. It was launched on Sep 27, 2016. SPTM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000.
Performance
ABFL vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABFL vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF | -0.10% | 8.07% | 18.26% | 22.97% | -14.60% | 30.66% | 18.30% | 26.03% | -6.26% | 15.23% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | -3.88% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 28.58% | 17.94% | 31.34% | -5.30% | 10.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABFL achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's -3.88% return.
ABFL
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 12.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -3.88%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ABFL vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABFL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ABFL vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
ABFL
SPTM
ABFL vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABFL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 0.97 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.48 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.22 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.51 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 7.28 | -2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABFL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 0.97 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.67 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.43 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABFL and SPTM is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ABFL vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
ABFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than SPTM's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF | 0.63% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.20% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Drawdowns
ABFL vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABFL drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABFL and SPTM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABFL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -54.80% | +19.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -12.21% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -24.14% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -6.07% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -9.10% | +4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.53% | +0.22% |
Volatility
ABFL vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) at 5.32%. This indicates that ABFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABFL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 5.32% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 9.52% | +2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.81% | 18.32% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 16.88% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 18.03% | +0.74% |