ABFL vs. ABLS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS).

ABFL and ABLS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ABFL is an actively managed fund by Abacus. It was launched on Sep 27, 2016. ABLS is a passively managed fund by Abacus that tracks the performance of the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025.

Performance

ABFL vs. ABLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ABFL vs. ABLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF	-0.10%	0.90%
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	-8.16%	-8.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABFL achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than ABLS's -8.16% return.

ABFL

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -3.07%
• YTD: -0.10%
• 6M: -0.80%
• 1Y: 12.02%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 10.27%
• 10Y*: —

ABLS

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: -8.16%
• 6M: -10.53%
• 1Y: -10.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABFL vs. ABLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABFL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLS's 0.39% expense ratio.

ABFL

Abacus FCF Leaders ETF

ABLS

Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF

Return for Risk

ABFL vs. ABLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABFL

ABFL Risk / Return Rank: 35
ABFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
ABFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
ABFL Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ABFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ABFL Martin Ratio Rank: 45

ABLS

ABLS Risk / Return Rank: 4
ABLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ABLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
ABLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ABLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
ABLS Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABFL vs. ABLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABFL	ABLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	-0.52	+1.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	-0.62	+1.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.93	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	-0.33	+1.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.45	-0.91	+5.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABFL vs. ABLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABFL Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the ABLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABFL and ABLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABFL	ABLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	-0.52	+1.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	-0.67	+1.36

Correlation

The correlation between ABFL and ABLS is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ABFL vs. ABLS - Dividend Comparison

ABFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than ABLS's 15.31% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF	0.63%	0.62%	0.70%	0.94%	1.36%	9.63%	0.41%	0.72%	0.62%	0.40%
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	15.31%	14.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ABFL vs. ABLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABFL drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than ABLS's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABFL and ABLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABFL	ABLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.95%	-19.28%	-15.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	-16.19%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.31%	-16.17%	+11.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-8.47%	+3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	5.87%	-3.12%

Volatility

ABFL vs. ABLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is 6.40%, while Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that ABFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABFL	ABLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	7.00%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.07%	13.17%	-1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.81%	21.94%	-2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	22.01%	-5.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.77%	22.01%	-3.24%