PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABEQ vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABEQ vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 640.02% return.


ABEQ

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.22%
6M
2.13%
YTD
4.41%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*

MUU

1D
9.50%
1M
-10.60%
6M
441.55%
YTD
640.02%
1Y
3,397.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABEQ vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
4.41%15.32%-1.88%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
640.02%599.03%-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ABEQ and MUU is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABEQ vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEQ
ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEQ vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABEQMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-28.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.73

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

81.19

-79.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

269.76

-267.17

ABEQ vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 29.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEQ and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABEQ vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABEQMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-75.07%

+47.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-52.72%

+44.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.56%

-30.27%

+23.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-23.44%

+19.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

16.68%

-12.86%

Volatility

ABEQ vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) is 3.01%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.96%. This indicates that ABEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABEQMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

67.96%

-64.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

115.39%

-108.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.12%

145.68%

-136.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

138.08%

-127.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.78%

138.08%

-124.30%

ABEQ vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABEQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABEQ vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than MUU's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
1.21%1.25%1.48%2.60%1.20%0.60%0.60%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.64%4.27%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABEQ and MUU have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (67.96%) compared to ABEQ (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABEQ dropped -27.82% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3397.63% vs 9.84% for ABEQ. On fees, ABEQ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, ABEQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3397.63% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABEQ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

ABEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.64% for MUU.

ABEQ is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Absolute Investment Advisers LLC and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ABEQ and 1.01% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (29.47 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABEQ and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer