ABEQ vs. FUNL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ABEQ returned 7.06%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for FUNL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABEQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FUNL.

Performance

ABEQ vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than FUNL's 5.66% return.

ABEQ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 3.44%
• 6M: 3.43%
• 1Y: 8.87%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: —

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 18.97%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABEQ vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	3.44%	15.32%	12.68%	4.63%	-1.00%	12.49%	9.03%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	14.62%	15.55%	14.33%	-5.76%	25.93%	14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ABEQ and FUNL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2020	0.77

The correlation between ABEQ and FUNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ABEQ vs. FUNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ABEQ	FUNL
Financial Services	24.8%	19.3%
Basic Materials	17.0%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	10.9%	7.0%
Energy	10.3%	7.6%
Industrials	8.3%	11.5%
Healthcare	7.2%	15.3%
Technology	4.4%	14.6%
Communication Services	3.0%	5.8%
Utilities	1.4%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.5%
Real Estate	-	4.5%

Return for Risk

ABEQ vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEQ

ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 25
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 80
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEQ vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABEQ	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	2.19	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	3.26	-1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.47	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	5.01	-3.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.78	23.31	-20.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABEQ vs. FUNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the FUNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEQ and FUNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABEQ	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	2.19	-1.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.63	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.95	-0.39

Drawdowns

ABEQ vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than FUNL's maximum drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and FUNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABEQ	FUNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.82%	-19.35%	-8.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-3.83%	-4.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.95%	-17.37%	+9.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.26%	-19.35%	+2.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.43%	-0.12%	-7.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-3.54%	-0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	0.82%	+2.38%

Volatility

ABEQ vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison

Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) at 0.00%. This indicates that ABEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABEQ	FUNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.98%	0.00%	+1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.69%	5.24%	+1.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.91%	8.82%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.81%	15.16%	-4.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.84%	15.29%	-1.45%

ABEQ vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABEQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABEQ vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than FUNL's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	1.21%	1.25%	1.48%	2.60%	1.20%	0.60%	0.60%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABEQ and FUNL in my portfolio?

ABEQ and FUNL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABEQ or FUNL?

ABEQ has higher volatility (1.98%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABEQ dropped -27.82% vs FUNL's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, ABEQ or FUNL?

On 5-year performance, FUNL leads with 9.42% vs 7.06% for ABEQ. On fees, FUNL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABEQ or FUNL?

Over the 5-year period, FUNL has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABEQ or FUNL?

FUNL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABEQ or FUNL?

FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.21% for ABEQ.

What is the main difference between ABEQ and FUNL?

They also come from different issuers: Absolute Investment Advisers LLC and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ABEQ and 0.50% for FUNL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FUNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.