ABEQ vs. DHLX
ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) and DHLX (Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. ABEQ is actively managed, while DHLX is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABEQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for DHLX.
Performance
ABEQ vs. DHLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than DHLX's -1.71% return.
ABEQ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 8.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- —
DHLX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- -1.71%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABEQ vs. DHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 3.44% | 0.69% |
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF | -1.71% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABEQ and DHLX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABEQ vs. DHLX — Risk / Return Rank
ABEQ
DHLX
ABEQ vs. DHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABEQ | DHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABEQ | DHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | -0.06 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
ABEQ vs. DHLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than DHLX's maximum drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and DHLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABEQ | DHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -8.40% | -19.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -5.56% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -2.38% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | — | — |
Volatility
ABEQ vs. DHLX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABEQ | DHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.91% | 11.43% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.81% | 11.43% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 11.43% | +2.41% |
ABEQ vs. DHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABEQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DHLX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABEQ vs. DHLX - Dividend Comparison
ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than DHLX's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 2.60% | 1.20% | 0.60% | 0.60% |
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF | 0.41% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABEQ and DHLX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DHLX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DHLX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.
ABEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.41% for DHLX.
They also come from different issuers: Absolute Investment Advisers LLC and Diamond Hill. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ABEQ and 0.55% for DHLX.
Find the right allocation for ABEQ and DHLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer