PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABEQ vs. AVLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABEQ vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.64% return.


ABEQ

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
3.44%
6M
3.43%
1Y
8.87%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*

AVLV

1D
0.14%
1M
5.75%
YTD
20.64%
6M
22.01%
1Y
38.77%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABEQ vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
3.44%15.32%12.68%4.63%-1.00%5.35%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
20.64%15.12%17.49%17.43%-5.53%5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ABEQ and AVLV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.73

The correlation between ABEQ and AVLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ABEQ vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ABEQ
AVLV

Financial Services

24.8%
16.3%

Basic Materials

17.0%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
7.7%

Energy

10.3%
14.4%

Industrials

8.3%
15.4%

Healthcare

7.2%
5.6%

Technology

4.4%
17.2%

Communication Services

3.0%
6.9%

Utilities

1.4%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

14.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Financial Services

ABEQ
24.8%
AVLV
16.3%

Basic Materials

ABEQ
17.0%
AVLV
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

ABEQ
10.9%
AVLV
7.7%

Energy

ABEQ
10.3%
AVLV
14.4%

Industrials

ABEQ
8.3%
AVLV
15.4%

Healthcare

ABEQ
7.2%
AVLV
5.6%

Technology

ABEQ
4.4%
AVLV
17.2%

Communication Services

ABEQ
3.0%
AVLV
6.9%

Utilities

ABEQ
1.4%
AVLV
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ABEQ

-

AVLV
14.1%

Real Estate

ABEQ

-

AVLV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABEQ vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEQ
ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEQ vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABEQAVLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.57

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

6.09

-4.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.78

24.39

-21.61

ABEQ vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEQ and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABEQAVLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

3.18

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.86

-0.30

Drawdowns

ABEQ vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and AVLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABEQAVLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-19.50%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-6.39%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-19.50%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

0.00%

-7.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-3.93%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

1.59%

+1.61%

Volatility

ABEQ vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) is 1.98%, while Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that ABEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABEQAVLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

3.12%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.69%

9.04%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

12.29%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.81%

17.35%

-6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

17.35%

-3.51%

ABEQ vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABEQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABEQ vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
1.21%1.25%1.48%2.60%1.20%0.60%0.60%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.07%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABEQ and AVLV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVLV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to ABEQ (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABEQ dropped -27.82% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 11.57% for ABEQ. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ABEQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.

ABEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.

They also come from different issuers: Absolute Investment Advisers LLC and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ABEQ and 0.15% for AVLV.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABEQ and AVLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer