ABEMX vs. LZEMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ABEMX (abrdn Emerging Markets Fund) and LZEMX (Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, ABEMX returned 10.73%/yr vs 11.16%/yr for LZEMX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ABEMX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for LZEMX.

Performance

ABEMX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEMX achieves a 34.30% return, which is significantly higher than LZEMX's 25.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ABEMX having a 10.73% annualized return and LZEMX not far ahead at 11.16%.

ABEMX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 7.97%
• YTD: 34.30%
• 6M: 35.10%
• 1Y: 64.70%
• 3Y*: 23.53%
• 5Y*: 8.32%
• 10Y*: 10.73%

LZEMX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 3.66%
• YTD: 25.47%
• 6M: 26.70%
• 1Y: 52.07%
• 3Y*: 27.62%
• 5Y*: 13.62%
• 10Y*: 11.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABEMX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund	34.30%	32.43%	3.98%	6.67%	-26.23%	7.15%	27.65%	20.42%	-14.65%	30.25%
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	25.47%	41.35%	7.60%	22.44%	-14.86%	5.37%	-0.07%	18.06%	-18.11%	28.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ABEMX and LZEMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2007	0.90

The correlation between ABEMX and LZEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ABEMX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEMX

ABEMX Risk / Return Rank: 90
ABEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ABEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ABEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ABEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ABEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

LZEMX

LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 95
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEMX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABEMX	LZEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.04	3.73	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	4.76	-1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.69	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	5.04	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.87	18.06	-0.19

ABEMX vs. LZEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is comparable to the LZEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEMX and LZEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABEMX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEMX drawdown since its inception was -54.52%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEMX and LZEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABEMX	LZEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.52%	-60.08%	+5.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.68%	-10.42%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.62%	-14.27%	-4.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.56%	-29.29%	-7.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.44%	-44.08%	+5.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.17%	+1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.07%	-16.61%	+3.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.65%	2.90%	+0.75%

Volatility

ABEMX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) has a higher volatility of 11.58% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) at 5.48%. This indicates that ABEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABEMX	LZEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.58%	5.48%	+6.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.37%	11.82%	+7.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.52%	14.09%	+7.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.22%	14.44%	+4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.93%	16.41%	+2.52%

ABEMX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABEMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABEMX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison

ABEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than LZEMX's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund	4.55%	6.11%	0.99%	1.42%	1.82%	22.95%	0.68%	1.85%	1.57%	1.32%	1.23%	2.47%
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	1.63%	2.05%	3.11%	3.76%	5.92%	4.89%	2.11%	2.45%	2.10%	1.99%	1.48%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABEMX and LZEMX in my portfolio?

ABEMX and LZEMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABEMX or LZEMX?

ABEMX has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to LZEMX (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABEMX dropped -54.52% vs LZEMX's -60.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 3.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.