LZEMX vs. LZIEX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

LZEMX (Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio) and LZIEX (Lazard International Equity Portfolio) are both mutual funds - LZEMX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Lazard, while LZIEX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, LZEMX returned 10.11%/yr vs 8.27%/yr for LZIEX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LZEMX charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for LZIEX.

Performance

LZEMX vs. LZIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) and Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZEMX achieves a 25.47% return, which is significantly higher than LZIEX's 10.40% return. Over the past 10 years, LZEMX has outperformed LZIEX with an annualized return of 10.11%, while LZIEX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.

LZEMX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 3.35%
• 6M: 14.87%
• YTD: 25.47%
• 1Y: 48.51%
• 3Y*: 25.92%
• 5Y*: 14.58%
• 10Y*: 10.11%
• ALL TIME*: 7.80%

LZIEX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: 3.60%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 1Y: 22.59%
• 3Y*: 16.65%
• 5Y*: 9.08%
• 10Y*: 8.27%
• ALL TIME*: 6.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LZEMX vs. LZIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	25.47%	41.35%	7.60%	22.44%	-14.86%	5.37%	-0.07%	18.06%	-18.11%	28.02%
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	10.40%	34.14%	5.30%	16.49%	-15.00%	6.14%	8.76%	21.20%	-13.71%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LZEMX and LZIEX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 1994	0.68

The correlation between LZEMX and LZIEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LZEMX vs. LZIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LZEMX

LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 95
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

LZIEX

LZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 50
LZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
LZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
LZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LZEMX vs. LZIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) and Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LZEMX	LZIEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.15	1.54	+1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	2.16	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.28	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	1.90	+2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.23	6.55	+8.68

LZEMX vs. LZIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is higher than the LZIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZEMX and LZIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LZEMX vs. LZIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZEMX drawdown since its inception was -60.08%, which is greater than LZIEX's maximum drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZEMX and LZIEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LZEMX	LZIEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.08%	-55.35%	-4.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.42%	-11.88%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.27%	-13.71%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.13%	-30.42%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.08%	-35.12%	-8.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-0.86%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.56%	-11.19%	-5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	3.45%	-0.38%

Volatility

LZEMX vs. LZIEX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) at 4.15%. This indicates that LZEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LZEMX	LZIEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	4.15%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.00%	12.52%	+0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.88%	14.71%	+0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.59%	15.88%	-1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.37%	15.90%	+0.47%

LZEMX vs. LZIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZEMX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than LZIEX's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

LZEMX vs. LZIEX - Dividend Comparison

LZEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than LZIEX's 11.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	1.63%	2.05%	3.11%	3.76%	5.92%	4.89%	2.11%	2.45%	2.10%	1.99%	1.48%	2.14%
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	11.19%	12.35%	8.26%	3.78%	6.12%	17.81%	1.03%	2.07%	7.93%	1.42%	1.06%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LZEMX and LZIEX in my portfolio?

LZEMX and LZIEX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LZEMX or LZIEX?

LZEMX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to LZIEX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZEMX dropped -60.08% vs LZIEX's -55.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.