LZEMX vs. DEMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX).
LZEMX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Jul 14, 1994. DEMIX is managed by Delaware Funds. It was launched on Jun 9, 1996.
Performance
LZEMX vs. DEMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LZEMX vs. DEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 5.00% | 41.35% | 7.60% | 22.44% | -14.86% | 5.37% | -0.07% | 18.06% | -18.11% | 28.02% |
DEMIX Delaware Emerging Markets Fund | 13.36% | 86.79% | 6.52% | 17.59% | -28.66% | -2.08% | 26.09% | 24.33% | -17.10% | 41.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZEMX achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly lower than DEMIX's 13.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LZEMX has underperformed DEMIX with an annualized return of 9.23%, while DEMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.40% annualized return.
LZEMX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 39.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
DEMIX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -18.24%
- YTD
- 13.36%
- 6M
- 43.46%
- 1Y
- 104.80%
- 3Y*
- 35.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LZEMX vs. DEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LZEMX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LZEMX vs. DEMIX — Risk / Return Rank
LZEMX
DEMIX
LZEMX vs. DEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LZEMX | DEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.74 | 3.11 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.49 | 3.29 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.51 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 4.81 | -1.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.04 | 18.57 | -5.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LZEMX | DEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 3.11 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.54 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.66 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.44 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between LZEMX and DEMIX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LZEMX vs. DEMIX - Dividend Comparison
LZEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than DEMIX's 16.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 1.95% | 2.05% | 3.11% | 3.76% | 5.92% | 4.89% | 2.11% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 2.14% |
DEMIX Delaware Emerging Markets Fund | 16.74% | 18.97% | 1.99% | 2.95% | 1.89% | 3.42% | 0.87% | 0.80% | 0.65% | 1.80% | 0.94% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
LZEMX vs. DEMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZEMX drawdown since its inception was -60.08%, roughly equal to the maximum DEMIX drawdown of -63.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZEMX and DEMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZEMX | DEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.08% | -63.15% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.61% | -20.32% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.55% | -43.95% | +13.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | -46.29% | +2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.42% | -19.53% | +9.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -18.54% | +1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 5.26% | -2.43% |
Volatility
LZEMX vs. DEMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) is 5.92%, while Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX) has a volatility of 19.15%. This indicates that LZEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LZEMX | DEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 19.15% | -13.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.63% | 28.50% | -18.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 33.36% | -19.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 23.11% | -9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 21.94% | -5.61% |