PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABBNY vs. MS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABBNY vs. MS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ABB Ltd (ABBNY) and Morgan Stanley (MS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABBNY achieves a 41.80% return, which is significantly higher than MS's 20.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ABBNY has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 21.38%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.13% annualized return.


ABBNY

1D
1.83%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
41.80%
6M
43.11%
1Y
82.41%
3Y*
41.86%
5Y*
27.12%
10Y*
21.38%

MS

1D
0.15%
1M
9.92%
YTD
20.86%
6M
21.34%
1Y
64.89%
3Y*
39.40%
5Y*
21.89%
10Y*
27.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABBNY vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABBNY
ABB Ltd
41.80%40.49%23.75%49.62%-18.13%40.40%21.21%31.87%-26.52%31.68%
MS
Morgan Stanley
20.86%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-22.76%26.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ABBNY and MS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2001

0.46

The correlation between ABBNY and MS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABBNY:

$188.22B

MS:

$338.10B

EPS

ABBNY:

$2.71

MS:

$11.41

PE Ratio

ABBNY:

38.10

MS:

18.59

PEG Ratio

ABBNY:

3.84

MS:

1.75

PS Ratio

ABBNY:

5.28

MS:

2.81

PB Ratio

ABBNY:

12.75

MS:

3.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABBNY:

$35.74B

MS:

$120.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABBNY:

$14.33B

MS:

$69.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABBNY:

$7.34B

MS:

$27.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABBNY vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABBNY
ABBNY Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ABBNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBNY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBNY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABBNY vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABB Ltd (ABBNY) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABBNYMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

3.46

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.73

11.46

+9.27

ABBNY vs. MS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABBNY Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the MS Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABBNY and MS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABBNYMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

2.55

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.77

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.86

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.29

-0.01

Drawdowns

ABBNY vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABBNY drawdown since its inception was -93.98%, which is greater than MS's maximum drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBNY and MS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABBNYMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.98%

-88.12%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.71%

-18.83%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.26%

-29.24%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.07%

-32.38%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.98%

-51.33%

+7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.13%

-2.76%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.54%

-33.70%

+8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

5.68%

-1.69%

Volatility

ABBNY vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

ABB Ltd (ABBNY) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Morgan Stanley (MS) at 8.06%. This indicates that ABBNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABBNYMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.45%

8.06%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.58%

21.21%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.78%

25.62%

+4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.06%

28.72%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.43%

31.51%

-6.08%

Dividends

ABBNY vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

ABBNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than MS's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBNY
ABB Ltd
1.18%1.39%1.79%2.07%2.88%2.29%2.77%3.31%4.35%2.84%3.47%4.21%
MS
Morgan Stanley
1.88%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%

Financials

ABBNY vs. MS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ABB Ltd and Morgan Stanley. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
8.73B
33.15B
(ABBNY) Total Revenue
(MS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ABBNY vs. MS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ABB Ltd and Morgan Stanley over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.4%
61.8%
Portfolio components
ABBNY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABB Ltd reported a gross profit of 3.44B and revenue of 8.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

MS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.

ABBNY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABB Ltd reported an operating income of 1.43B and revenue of 8.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.

MS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.

ABBNY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABB Ltd reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 8.73B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.

MS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ABBNY and MS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABBNY has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to MS (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBNY dropped -93.98% vs MS's -88.12%.

ABBNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABBNY and MS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer