AB vs. APO
AB (AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.) and APO (Apollo Global Management, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, AB returned 14.50%/yr vs 29.16%/yr for APO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AB vs. APO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AB achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly higher than APO's -6.75% return. Over the past 10 years, AB has underperformed APO with an annualized return of 14.50%, while APO has yielded a comparatively higher 29.16% annualized return.
AB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -4.63%
- 1Y
- 0.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.50%
APO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 6M
- -8.82%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 20.72%
- 10Y*
- 29.16%
AB vs. APO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | -0.96% | 13.36% | 30.40% | -2.29% | -23.46% | 56.27% | 23.00% | 19.85% | 21.04% | 16.76% |
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | -6.75% | -11.12% | 79.87% | 49.44% | -9.59% | 53.25% | 8.00% | 106.46% | -22.03% | 85.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between AB and APO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011 | 0.39 |
The correlation between AB and APO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AB:
$3.37B
APO:
$79.66B
AB:
$3.22
APO:
$3.58
AB:
11.32
APO:
37.38
AB:
14.08
APO:
2.71
AB:
2.67
APO:
4.29
AB:
$250.00M
APO:
$29.68B
AB:
$250.00M
APO:
$26.52B
AB:
$252.50M
APO:
$9.28B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AB vs. APO — Risk / Return Rank
AB
APO
AB vs. APO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AB | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | -0.04 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | -0.09 | -0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AB vs. APO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AB drawdown since its inception was -87.65%, which is greater than APO's maximum drawdown of -56.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AB and APO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AB | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.65% | -56.99% | -30.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -34.97% | +20.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.59% | -42.82% | +22.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.76% | -42.82% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.08% | -53.48% | -4.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.95% | -23.36% | +12.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.20% | -16.39% | -9.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.79% | 16.70% | -9.91% |
Volatility
AB vs. APO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) is 4.16%, while Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that AB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AB | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 8.49% | -4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 26.89% | -8.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.38% | 35.44% | -13.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.23% | 37.11% | -8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.39% | 37.83% | -5.44% |
Dividends
AB vs. APO - Dividend Comparison
AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than APO's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 9.36% | 9.02% | 8.03% | 8.44% | 10.30% | 7.33% | 8.26% | 7.67% | 10.54% | 8.50% | 7.46% | 8.09% |
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 1.56% | 1.38% | 1.10% | 1.81% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 4.72% | 4.23% | 7.86% | 5.53% | 6.46% | 12.91% |
Financials
AB vs. APO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and Apollo Global Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AB and APO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APO has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to AB (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AB dropped -87.65% vs APO's -56.99%.
APO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AB and APO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer