AAXJ vs. FLJH

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

AAXJ (iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF) and FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAXJ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while FLJH is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AAXJ returned 7.14%/yr vs 21.12%/yr for FLJH. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAXJ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJH.

Performance

AAXJ vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAXJ achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly higher than FLJH's 20.00% return.

AAXJ

• 1D: 2.58%
• 1M: 0.22%
• 6M: 13.71%
• YTD: 23.07%
• 1Y: 38.45%
• 3Y*: 21.08%
• 5Y*: 7.14%
• 10Y*: 8.92%
• ALL TIME*: 6.55%

FLJH

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -0.86%
• 6M: 12.42%
• YTD: 20.00%
• 1Y: 38.42%
• 3Y*: 26.81%
• 5Y*: 21.12%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF	$46.72M	$64.51M	$77.70M
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	$3.04M	$2.02M	$1.55M

AAXJ vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF	23.07%	31.53%	10.41%	4.79%	-20.35%	-5.73%	23.35%	17.93%	-15.04%	2.16%
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	20.00%	25.26%	25.89%	36.02%	-2.75%	12.68%	10.65%	20.34%	-14.66%	1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AAXJ and FLJH is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.50

The correlation between AAXJ and FLJH shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AAXJ vs. FLJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAXJ	FLJH
Technology	51.1%	23.1%
Financial Services	16.1%	16.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	12.1%
Industrials	6.8%	23.5%
Communication Services	5.9%	7.1%
Basic Materials	2.9%	4.0%
Healthcare	2.6%	5.2%
Energy	2.1%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	4.0%
Utilities	1.5%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.3%	2.9%

Return for Risk

AAXJ vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAXJ

AAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 58
AAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
AAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
AAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
AAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
AAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FLJH

FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 80
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAXJ vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAXJ	FLJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	2.02	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.71	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.36	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	3.58	-0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.99	12.57	-4.58

AAXJ vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAXJ and FLJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAXJ vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, which is greater than FLJH's maximum drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAXJ and FLJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAXJ	FLJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.37%	-31.51%	-17.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.94%	-10.80%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.74%	-20.39%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.74%	-20.39%	-17.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.07%	-4.23%	-3.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.96%	-5.27%	-8.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.83%	3.06%	+1.77%

Volatility

AAXJ vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a higher volatility of 9.20% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 6.04%. This indicates that AAXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAXJ	FLJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.20%	6.04%	+3.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.06%	15.34%	+7.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.30%	19.20%	+6.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.95%	18.77%	+2.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.71%	19.88%	+0.83%

AAXJ vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAXJ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAXJ vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than FLJH's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF	1.35%	1.81%	1.86%	1.95%	1.74%	2.21%	1.06%	1.83%	2.10%	1.99%	1.77%	2.44%
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	2.51%	3.90%	5.06%	25.59%	26.67%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAXJ and FLJH in my portfolio?

AAXJ and FLJH have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAXJ or FLJH?

AAXJ has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to FLJH (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAXJ dropped -49.37% vs FLJH's -31.51%.

Which ETF is better, AAXJ or FLJH?

On 5-year performance, FLJH leads with 21.12% vs 7.14% for AAXJ. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJH has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAXJ or FLJH?

Over the 5-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 21.12% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAXJ or FLJH?

FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AAXJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAXJ or FLJH?

FLJH has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.35% for AAXJ.

What is the main difference between AAXJ and FLJH?

AAXJ is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FLJH is Japan Equities. AAXJ tracks MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AAXJ and 0.09% for FLJH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.