PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAVM vs. QVMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AAVM vs. QVMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AAVM vs. QVMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AAVM
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
6.19%18.54%12.07%-0.74%-7.00%-1.91%
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
3.32%8.82%13.36%15.43%-13.06%6.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAVM achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than QVMM's 3.32% return.


AAVM

1D
3.68%
1M
-7.57%
YTD
6.19%
6M
11.24%
1Y
30.33%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*

QVMM

1D
2.76%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
3.32%
6M
5.26%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAVM vs. QVMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QVMM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AAVM vs. QVMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAVM
AAVM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AAVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AAVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

QVMM
QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAVM vs. QVMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAVMQVMMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

0.91

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

1.40

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.20

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.35

+1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.49

6.02

+4.47

AAVM vs. QVMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the QVMM Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAVM and QVMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAVMQVMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

0.91

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.34

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between AAVM and QVMM is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AAVM vs. QVMM - Dividend Comparison

AAVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than QVMM's 1.29% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAVM
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
1.93%2.05%2.54%4.13%2.24%0.82%0.00%1.76%0.93%0.81%
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.29%1.32%1.29%1.42%1.51%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AAVM vs. QVMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAVM drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, which is greater than QVMM's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAVM and QVMM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AAVMQVMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-24.00%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-14.17%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.57%

-5.77%

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.55%

-7.29%

-6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.17%

-0.21%

Volatility

AAVM vs. QVMM - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) at 6.32%. This indicates that AAVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QVMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AAVMQVMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

6.32%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

11.56%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

20.79%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.65%

19.61%

-3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.82%

19.61%

-4.79%