AAVM vs. ABCS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AAVM (Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF) and ABCS (Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAVM is a Multi-factor fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while ABCS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BNY Mellon ABC Index. AAVM is actively managed, while ABCS is passively managed. Over the past year, AAVM returned 34.59% vs 16.85% for ABCS. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAVM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for ABCS.

Performance

AAVM vs. ABCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAVM achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than ABCS's 6.97% return.

AAVM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 17.28%
• 6M: 20.07%
• 1Y: 34.59%
• 3Y*: 19.57%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: —

ABCS

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 6.97%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 16.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAVM vs. ABCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF	17.28%	18.54%	12.07%	1.57%
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	6.97%	7.95%	14.47%	1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between AAVM and ABCS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023	0.75

The correlation between AAVM and ABCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

AAVM vs. ABCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAVM	ABCS
Industrials	28.7%	10.9%
Basic Materials	15.4%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	15.3%	13.7%
Technology	14.4%	14.0%
Energy	6.0%	6.5%
Healthcare	5.8%	14.7%
Utilities	4.3%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	4.8%
Communication Services	3.4%	2.0%
Real Estate	1.4%	5.0%
Financial Services	1.3%	21.3%

Return for Risk

AAVM vs. ABCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAVM

AAVM Risk / Return Rank: 69
AAVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
AAVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AAVM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
AAVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AAVM Martin Ratio Rank: 72

ABCS

ABCS Risk / Return Rank: 38
ABCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
ABCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ABCS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
ABCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
ABCS Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAVM vs. ABCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAVM	ABCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	1.25	+1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	1.89	+1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.22	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	2.03	+1.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.42	6.39	+7.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAVM vs. ABCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the ABCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAVM and ABCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAVM	ABCS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	1.25	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.76	-0.41

Drawdowns

AAVM vs. ABCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAVM drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, which is greater than ABCS's maximum drawdown of -20.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAVM and ABCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAVM	ABCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.71%	-20.52%	-14.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.85%	-8.33%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-0.49%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.32%	-3.53%	-9.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	2.64%	-0.06%

Volatility

AAVM vs. ABCS - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) at 2.66%. This indicates that AAVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAVM	ABCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.00%	2.66%	+2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.87%	9.27%	+3.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.26%	13.60%	+1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.68%	17.09%	-1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.90%	17.09%	-2.19%

AAVM vs. ABCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ABCS's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAVM vs. ABCS - Dividend Comparison

AAVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than ABCS's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF	1.75%	2.05%	2.54%	4.13%	2.24%	0.82%	0.00%	1.76%	0.93%	0.81%
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	1.26%	1.37%	1.39%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAVM and ABCS in my portfolio?

AAVM and ABCS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAVM or ABCS?

AAVM has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to ABCS (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAVM dropped -34.71% vs ABCS's -20.52%.

Which ETF is better, AAVM or ABCS?

On 1-year performance, AAVM leads with 34.59% vs 16.85% for ABCS. On fees, ABCS is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, ABCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAVM or ABCS?

Over the 1-year period, AAVM has performed better with a 34.59% return vs 16.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAVM or ABCS?

ABCS is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AAVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAVM or ABCS?

AAVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.26% for ABCS.

What is the main difference between AAVM and ABCS?

AAVM is categorized as Multi-factor, while ABCS is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AAVM and 0.27% for ABCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.