PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AASCX vs. TMAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AASCX vs. TMAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASCX achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly higher than TMAAX's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AASCX has outperformed TMAAX with an annualized return of 10.67%, while TMAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.


AASCX

1D
0.73%
1M
4.81%
YTD
15.09%
6M
14.56%
1Y
20.50%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
10.67%

TMAAX

1D
0.35%
1M
4.23%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.40%
1Y
22.28%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASCX vs. TMAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AASCX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund
15.09%4.43%14.60%13.65%-17.85%27.70%21.68%24.51%-10.73%8.73%
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
9.08%15.13%19.29%17.06%-17.79%15.74%14.13%21.47%-6.30%11.50%

Correlation

The correlation between AASCX and TMAAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2005

0.93

The correlation between AASCX and TMAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AASCX vs. TMAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASCX
AASCX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TMAAX
TMAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TMAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASCX vs. TMAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AASCXTMAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.42

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

3.03

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

13.49

-4.77

AASCX vs. TMAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the TMAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASCX and TMAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AASCXTMAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.27

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.66

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.74

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.46

-0.08

Drawdowns

AASCX vs. TMAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASCX drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than TMAAX's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASCX and TMAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AASCXTMAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.55%

-50.54%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-7.55%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.23%

-14.37%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.80%

-26.55%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.67%

-26.99%

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-7.36%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

1.69%

+0.80%

Volatility

AASCX vs. TMAAX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) at 2.76%. This indicates that AASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AASCXTMAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

2.76%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

7.86%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

10.08%

+4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

13.88%

+6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.86%

13.32%

+7.54%

AASCX vs. TMAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASCX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAAX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

AASCX vs. TMAAX - Dividend Comparison

AASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, more than TMAAX's 6.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AASCX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund
13.01%14.98%9.22%1.54%3.15%12.54%3.54%2.92%12.94%0.09%0.10%0.00%
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
6.68%7.29%11.82%3.55%3.03%6.94%4.16%6.27%6.01%1.10%0.99%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


AASCX and TMAAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AASCX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to TMAAX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASCX dropped -56.55% vs TMAAX's -50.54%.

TMAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AASCX and TMAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer