PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAS.L vs. TIBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAS.L vs. TIBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AAS.L is traded in GBp, while TIBAX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TIBAX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AAS.L having a 15.99% return and TIBAX slightly higher at 16.29%. Over the past 10 years, AAS.L has outperformed TIBAX with an annualized return of 16.32%, while TIBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.01% annualized return.


AAS.L

1D
0.24%
1M
-8.18%
YTD
15.99%
6M
15.36%
1Y
37.00%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
16.32%

TIBAX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.60%
YTD
16.29%
6M
18.20%
1Y
37.84%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
16.88%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAS.L vs. TIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAS.L
Abrdn Asia Focus plc
15.99%26.73%13.15%6.64%-10.14%28.05%19.52%16.63%4.69%20.45%
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
16.29%26.89%15.20%12.11%2.99%21.22%-3.58%13.24%1.12%4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AAS.L and TIBAX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAS.L vs. TIBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAS.L
AAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBAX
TIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
TIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAS.L vs. TIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAS.LTIBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.88

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

8.07

-5.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.46

34.10

-24.65

AAS.L vs. TIBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the TIBAX Sharpe Ratio of 4.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAS.L and TIBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAS.LTIBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

4.51

-2.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

1.65

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.95

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.73

-0.73

Drawdowns

AAS.L vs. TIBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than TIBAX's maximum drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAS.L and TIBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAS.LTIBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-29.19%

-70.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.97%

-4.67%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.76%

-8.83%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.17%

-8.83%

-14.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

-29.19%

-6.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.43%

-1.57%

-76.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.82%

-4.47%

-76.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

1.10%

+2.80%

Volatility

AAS.L vs. TIBAX - Volatility Comparison

Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) at 3.04%. This indicates that AAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAS.LTIBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

3.04%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.04%

6.60%

+9.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

8.37%

+10.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

10.26%

+8.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

13.80%

+5.47%

Dividends

AAS.L vs. TIBAX - Dividend Comparison

AAS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than TIBAX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAS.L
Abrdn Asia Focus plc
1.53%1.77%2.53%3.26%4.11%0.00%8.14%8.84%8.40%7.58%5.54%10.18%
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
4.97%5.64%5.44%4.67%5.62%5.10%4.11%4.23%4.49%4.22%3.83%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAS.L and TIBAX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAS.L and TIBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer