AAS.L vs. FCIT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L) and F&C Investment Trust plc (FCIT.L).
Performance
AAS.L vs. FCIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAS.L vs. FCIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAS.L Abrdn Asia Focus plc | 4.81% | 26.73% | 12.51% | 5.98% | -10.06% | 28.05% | 10.63% | 8.11% | -2.48% | 13.19% |
FCIT.L F&C Investment Trust plc | -0.98% | 14.68% | 16.94% | 8.10% | -0.89% | 19.40% | 4.62% | 22.88% | -0.57% | 21.04% |
Fundamentals
AAS.L:
£612.30M
FCIT.L:
£5.96B
AAS.L:
£0.79
FCIT.L:
£3.45
AAS.L:
4.81
FCIT.L:
3.58
AAS.L:
0.03
FCIT.L:
0.13
AAS.L:
4.26
FCIT.L:
3.35
AAS.L:
1.10
FCIT.L:
0.97
AAS.L:
£143.63M
FCIT.L:
£1.78B
AAS.L:
£144.66M
FCIT.L:
£1.77B
AAS.L:
£81.98M
FCIT.L:
£1.04B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAS.L achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly higher than FCIT.L's -0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, AAS.L has underperformed FCIT.L with an annualized return of 11.56%, while FCIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.
AAS.L
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -8.21%
- YTD
- 4.81%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 33.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
FCIT.L
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 15.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAS.L vs. FCIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
AAS.L
FCIT.L
AAS.L vs. FCIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L) and F&C Investment Trust plc (FCIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAS.L | FCIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 1.01 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 1.49 | +0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.20 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.16 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.34 | 7.52 | +1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAS.L | FCIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.01 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.68 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.74 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.48 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAS.L and FCIT.L is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AAS.L vs. FCIT.L - Dividend Comparison
AAS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than FCIT.L's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAS.L Abrdn Asia Focus plc | 1.69% | 1.77% | 1.98% | 2.65% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.77% | 1.68% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 2.04% |
FCIT.L F&C Investment Trust plc | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.36% | 1.44% | 1.46% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.49% | 1.71% | 1.57% | 1.78% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
AAS.L vs. FCIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAS.L drawdown since its inception was -72.60%, which is greater than FCIT.L's maximum drawdown of -68.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAS.L and FCIT.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAS.L | FCIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.60% | -68.22% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -10.43% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.59% | -19.70% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -39.19% | +3.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.38% | -4.11% | -6.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -10.39% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 2.23% | +1.40% |
Volatility
AAS.L vs. FCIT.L - Volatility Comparison
Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to F&C Investment Trust plc (FCIT.L) at 5.70%. This indicates that AAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAS.L | FCIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.65% | 5.70% | +1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.25% | 9.78% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.45% | 15.36% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 15.96% | +2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 17.30% | +1.03% |
Financials
AAS.L vs. FCIT.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abrdn Asia Focus plc and F&C Investment Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities