AAS.L vs. ATR.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L) and Schroders Investment Trusts - Schroder Asian Total Return Investment Company plc (ATR.L).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AAS.L or ATR.L.
Correlation
The correlation between AAS.L and ATR.L is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AAS.L vs. ATR.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AAS.L:
2.80
ATR.L:
0.99
AAS.L:
28.93
ATR.L:
1.45
AAS.L:
5.07
ATR.L:
1.19
AAS.L:
32.47
ATR.L:
0.82
AAS.L:
263.96
ATR.L:
6.12
AAS.L:
2.01%
ATR.L:
2.40%
AAS.L:
187.97%
ATR.L:
14.91%
AAS.L:
-73.14%
ATR.L:
-70.83%
AAS.L:
-2.65%
ATR.L:
-3.24%
Fundamentals
AAS.L:
£442.30M
ATR.L:
£453.59M
AAS.L:
£0.23
ATR.L:
£0.70
AAS.L:
12.78
ATR.L:
6.93
AAS.L:
£55.05M
ATR.L:
£71.91M
AAS.L:
£53.49M
ATR.L:
£68.77M
AAS.L:
£52.89M
ATR.L:
£45.90M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAS.L achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than ATR.L's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, AAS.L has outperformed ATR.L with an annualized return of 24.60%, while ATR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.76% annualized return.
AAS.L
0.34%
0.34%
171.14%
532.47%
50.76%
24.60%
ATR.L
0.41%
0.21%
10.73%
16.54%
7.68%
10.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AAS.L vs. ATR.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AAS.L
ATR.L
AAS.L vs. ATR.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L) and Schroders Investment Trusts - Schroder Asian Total Return Investment Company plc (ATR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AAS.L vs. ATR.L - Dividend Comparison
AAS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 253.15%, more than ATR.L's 2.37% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAS.L Abrdn Asia Focus plc | 253.15% | 254.01% | 325.56% | 372.34% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.22% | 0.41% | 0.29% |
ATR.L Schroders Investment Trusts - Schroder Asian Total Return Investment Company plc | 2.37% | 2.38% | 2.50% | 2.08% | 1.40% | 1.33% | 1.68% | 1.45% | 1.24% | 1.49% | 1.71% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
AAS.L vs. ATR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAS.L drawdown since its inception was -73.14%, roughly equal to the maximum ATR.L drawdown of -70.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAS.L and ATR.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AAS.L vs. ATR.L - Volatility Comparison
Abrdn Asia Focus plc (AAS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Schroders Investment Trusts - Schroder Asian Total Return Investment Company plc (ATR.L) at 4.59%. This indicates that AAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AAS.L vs. ATR.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abrdn Asia Focus plc and Schroders Investment Trusts - Schroder Asian Total Return Investment Company plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities