AAPY vs. WEEK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AAPY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF) and WEEK (Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Kurv, while WEEK is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPY returned 43.66% vs 3.81% for WEEK. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for WEEK.

Performance

AAPY vs. WEEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly higher than WEEK's 1.44% return.

AAPY

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: 13.81%
• YTD: 14.66%
• 6M: 11.04%
• 1Y: 43.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WEEK

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPY vs. WEEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF	14.66%	11.01%
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF	1.44%	3.37%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPY and WEEK is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025	0.03

Return for Risk

AAPY vs. WEEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPY

AAPY Risk / Return Rank: 58
AAPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AAPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AAPY Omega Ratio Rank: 62
AAPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AAPY Martin Ratio Rank: 50

WEEK

WEEK Risk / Return Rank: 99
WEEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Omega Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPY vs. WEEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAPY	WEEK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	9.29	-7.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	19.14	-16.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	4.65	-3.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	29.49	-26.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.23	263.82	-255.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAPY vs. WEEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the WEEK Sharpe Ratio of 9.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPY and WEEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAPY	WEEK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	9.29	-7.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	10.05	-9.18

Drawdowns

AAPY vs. WEEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than WEEK's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and WEEK.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPY	WEEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.22%	-0.13%	-29.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.47%	-0.13%	-14.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	0.00%	-1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.34%	-0.01%	-6.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.32%	0.01%	+5.31%

Volatility

AAPY vs. WEEK - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) at 0.07%. This indicates that AAPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPY	WEEK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.18%	0.07%	+6.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.77%	0.25%	+17.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.42%	0.41%	+21.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.58%	0.39%	+22.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.58%	0.39%	+22.19%

AAPY vs. WEEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than WEEK's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPY vs. WEEK - Dividend Comparison

AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.30%, more than WEEK's 3.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF	11.30%	12.66%	17.15%	2.16%
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF	3.72%	3.27%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPY and WEEK in my portfolio?

AAPY and WEEK have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPY or WEEK?

AAPY has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to WEEK (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPY dropped -29.22% vs WEEK's -0.13%.

Which ETF is better, AAPY or WEEK?

On 1-year performance, AAPY leads with 43.66% vs 3.81% for WEEK. On fees, WEEK is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, WEEK has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPY or WEEK?

Over the 1-year period, AAPY has performed better with a 43.66% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPY or WEEK?

WEEK is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AAPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPY or WEEK?

AAPY has the higher dividend yield at 11.30%, compared with 3.72% for WEEK.

What is the main difference between AAPY and WEEK?

AAPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while WEEK is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AAPY and 0.19% for WEEK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WEEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.