PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPX vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPX vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.


AAPX

1D
-3.52%
1M
24.03%
YTD
21.23%
6M
8.76%
1Y
97.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPX vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
21.23%-4.95%56.69%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and USL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between AAPX and USL has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.24, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

AAPX vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AAPX
USL

Technology

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AAPX
100.0%
USL

-

Basic Materials

AAPX

-

USL

-

Communication Services

AAPX

-

USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

AAPX

-

USL

-

Consumer Defensive

AAPX

-

USL

-

Energy

AAPX

-

USL

-

Financial Services

AAPX

-

USL
4.5%

Healthcare

AAPX

-

USL

-

Industrials

AAPX

-

USL

-

Real Estate

AAPX

-

USL

-

Utilities

AAPX

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPX vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX
AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPXUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.47

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

7.02

+0.73

AAPX vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPX and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPXUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.04

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.01

+0.51

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPXUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-89.06%

+30.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.12%

-16.76%

-13.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-38.16%

+34.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.36%

-61.46%

+42.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.66%

8.27%

+4.39%

Volatility

AAPX vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) at 10.53%. This indicates that AAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPXUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.21%

10.53%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.05%

23.33%

+8.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.99%

28.54%

+16.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.62%

30.08%

+24.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.62%

32.35%

+22.27%

AAPX vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPX vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
0.55%0.67%21.46%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPX and USL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPX has higher volatility (11.21%) compared to USL (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPX dropped -58.55% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 97.74% vs 57.86% for USL. On fees, USL is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, USL has been the lower-risk option at 10.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 97.74% return vs 57.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USL is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.

AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

AAPX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 0.88% for USL.

AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPX and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer