PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. TT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAPL vs. TT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AAPL having a 20.35% return and TT slightly higher at 20.85%. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed TT with an annualized return of 30.70%, while TT has yielded a comparatively lower 23.26% annualized return.


AAPL

1D
-2.14%
1M
9.59%
6M
28.05%
YTD
20.35%
1Y
55.26%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
18.17%
10Y*
30.70%
ALL TIME*
19.46%

TT

1D
-0.39%
1M
-3.15%
6M
20.75%
YTD
20.85%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
20.22%
10Y*
23.26%
ALL TIME*
15.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. TT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAPL
Apple Inc
20.35%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%
TT
Trane Technologies plc
20.85%6.38%52.97%47.39%-15.34%41.02%11.26%48.32%4.41%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and TT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985

0.30

The correlation between AAPL and TT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAPL:

$4.80T

TT:

$103.49B

EPS

AAPL:

$8.25

TT:

$12.96

PE Ratio

AAPL:

39.60

TT:

36.14

PEG Ratio

AAPL:

5.21

TT:

1.65

PS Ratio

AAPL:

10.75

TT:

4.85

PB Ratio

AAPL:

45.29

TT:

12.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAPL:

$451.44B

TT:

$21.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAPL:

$216.07B

TT:

$7.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

AAPL:

$153.63B

TT:

$4.25B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. TT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

TT
TT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. TT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPLTTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.06

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

0.28

+3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

0.55

+9.03

AAPL vs. TT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the TT Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and TT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. TT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, roughly equal to the maximum TT drawdown of -77.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and TT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-77.91%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-19.97%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-24.44%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-40.53%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

-51.13%

+12.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-7.01%

+4.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.54%

-14.81%

-14.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.78%

10.21%

-4.43%

Volatility

AAPL vs. TT - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc (AAPL) has a higher volatility of 10.61% compared to Trane Technologies plc (TT) at 9.88%. This indicates that AAPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.61%

9.88%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.34%

22.99%

-3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.55%

28.91%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.79%

27.54%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.08%

28.36%

+0.72%

Dividends

AAPL vs. TT - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than TT's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.32%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
TT
Trane Technologies plc
0.85%0.97%0.91%1.23%1.59%1.17%1.46%1.59%2.15%1.91%1.81%2.10%

Financials

AAPL vs. TT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and Trane Technologies plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
111.18B
4.97B
(AAPL) Total Revenue
(TT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AAPL vs. TT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Apple Inc and Trane Technologies plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
49.3%
34.8%
Portfolio components
AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

TT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

TT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 776.10M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.

TT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 584.40M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and TT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to TT (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs TT's -77.91%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and TT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer