PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPL vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly lower than SPEM's 13.59% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 29.88%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.78% annualized return.


AAPL

1D
1.82%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
9.24%
6M
8.34%
1Y
51.49%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
18.50%
10Y*
29.88%

SPEM

1D
2.03%
1M
4.58%
YTD
13.59%
6M
15.58%
1Y
30.33%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAPL
Apple Inc
9.24%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
13.59%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and SPEM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007

0.47

The correlation between AAPL and SPEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.48 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPLSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.34

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

2.68

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

9.60

-0.29

AAPL vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than SPEM's maximum drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-64.41%

-17.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-11.36%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-17.62%

-15.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-31.75%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

-36.06%

-2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.96%

-0.41%

-5.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.59%

-14.73%

-14.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

3.17%

+2.37%

Volatility

AAPL vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc (AAPL) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) have volatilities of 7.00% and 7.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

7.16%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.62%

14.34%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.70%

16.74%

+5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.52%

17.29%

+10.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.94%

18.85%

+10.09%

Dividends

AAPL vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than SPEM's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.44%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and SPEM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to AAPL (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer