AAPL vs. CSU.TO
AAPL (Apple Inc) and CSU.TO (Constellation Software Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — AAPL in Consumer Electronics, CSU.TO in Software - Application. Over the past 10 years, AAPL returned 29.36%/yr vs 18.59%/yr for CSU.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAPL vs. CSU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AAPL is traded in USD, while CSU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CSU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly higher than CSU.TO's -13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed CSU.TO with an annualized return of 29.36%, while CSU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.59% annualized return.
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 48.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.59%
- 10Y*
- 29.36%
CSU.TO
- 1D
- -4.66%
- 1M
- 16.04%
- YTD
- -13.23%
- 6M
- -12.26%
- 1Y
- -41.89%
- 3Y*
- 0.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 18.59%
AAPL vs. CSU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 7.29% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | -13.14% | -22.07% | 24.91% | 59.50% | -15.08% | 42.35% | 34.75% | 53.68% | 6.27% | 34.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL and CSU.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2006 | 0.21 |
The correlation between AAPL and CSU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AAPL:
$4.30T
CSU.TO:
CA$61.96B
AAPL:
$8.24
CSU.TO:
$34.85
AAPL:
35.35
CSU.TO:
60.01
AAPL:
4.65
CSU.TO:
3.15
AAPL:
9.60
CSU.TO:
3.65
AAPL:
40.37
CSU.TO:
11.40
AAPL:
$451.44B
CSU.TO:
$12.15B
AAPL:
$216.07B
CSU.TO:
$5.28B
AAPL:
$153.63B
CSU.TO:
$3.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL vs. CSU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL
CSU.TO
AAPL vs. CSU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPL | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.83 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | -0.76 | +4.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | -1.14 | +9.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPL vs. CSU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than CSU.TO's maximum drawdown of -55.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and CSU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.80% | -55.74% | -26.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -55.24% | +41.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.36% | -55.74% | +22.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.36% | -55.74% | +22.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | -55.74% | +17.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -44.10% | +36.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.59% | -7.66% | -21.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 36.71% | -31.18% |
Volatility
AAPL vs. CSU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 6.73%, while Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) has a volatility of 14.23%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 14.23% | -7.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.53% | 34.31% | -17.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.64% | 41.58% | -18.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 29.09% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.92% | 28.07% | +0.85% |
Dividends
AAPL vs. CSU.TO - Dividend Comparison
AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than CSU.TO's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.24% | 0.17% | 0.32% | 1.85% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.71% | 0.81% |
Financials
AAPL vs. CSU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and Constellation Software Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AAPL vs. CSU.TO - Profitability Comparison
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
CSU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a gross profit of 731.81M and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
CSU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported an operating income of 451.48M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
CSU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a net income of 360.99M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL and CSU.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AAPL and CSU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer