AAPB vs. OILK
AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPB is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. AAPB is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAPB returned 23.23%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for OILK. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPB charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
AAPB vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
AAPB
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- 24.81%
- YTD
- 23.70%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 106.72%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
AAPB vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 23.70% | -0.93% | 47.02% | 77.21% | -38.44% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | -4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPB and OILK is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.01 |
The correlation between AAPB and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AAPB vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAPB
OILK
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AAPB
OILK
-
Basic Materials
AAPB
-
OILK
-
Communication Services
AAPB
-
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
AAPB
-
OILK
Consumer Defensive
AAPB
-
OILK
-
Energy
AAPB
-
OILK
-
Financial Services
AAPB
-
OILK
-
Healthcare
AAPB
-
OILK
-
Industrials
AAPB
-
OILK
-
Real Estate
AAPB
-
OILK
-
Utilities
AAPB
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPB vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
AAPB
OILK
AAPB vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 3.42 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | 6.91 | +2.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.06 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.12 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
AAPB vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.13% | -83.76% | +25.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.11% | -17.35% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.13% | -23.42% | -34.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -3.66% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -32.61% | +13.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.64% | 8.56% | +3.08% |
Volatility
AAPB vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) has a higher volatility of 11.20% compared to ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) at 10.44%. This indicates that AAPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.20% | 10.44% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.96% | 23.26% | +8.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.82% | 28.75% | +16.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.33% | 30.12% | +21.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.33% | 35.97% | +15.36% |
AAPB vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPB vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 3.55% | 4.39% | 0.00% | 18.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPB and OILK have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPB has higher volatility (11.20%) compared to OILK (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 3-year performance, AAPB leads with 23.23% vs 19.03% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OILK has been the lower-risk option at 10.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AAPB has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 19.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AAPB.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 3.55% for AAPB.
AAPB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AAPB and 0.68% for OILK.
AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPB and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer