AAPB vs. NVDG
AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) and NVDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPB returned 106.72% vs 83.14% for NVDG. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPB charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NVDG.
Performance
AAPB vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly higher than NVDG's 18.93% return.
AAPB
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- 24.81%
- YTD
- 23.70%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 106.72%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDG
- 1D
- -7.35%
- 1M
- 14.07%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 26.05%
- 1Y
- 83.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPB vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 23.70% | -0.93% | 1.35% |
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 18.93% | 32.45% | -0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPB and NVDG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPB vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank
AAPB
NVDG
AAPB vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPB | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.22 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 1.96 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | 4.44 | +4.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPB | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.24 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.40 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
AAPB vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum NVDG drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and NVDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPB | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.13% | -66.19% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.11% | -42.72% | +14.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -18.34% | +15.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -23.07% | +3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.64% | 18.77% | -7.13% |
Volatility
AAPB vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is 11.20%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) has a volatility of 25.14%. This indicates that AAPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPB | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.20% | 25.14% | -13.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.96% | 50.15% | -18.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.82% | 67.81% | -22.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.33% | 90.72% | -39.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.33% | 90.72% | -39.39% |
AAPB vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPB vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison
AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than NVDG's 9.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 3.55% | 4.39% | 0.00% | 18.75% |
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 9.93% | 11.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPB and NVDG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDG has higher volatility (25.14%) compared to AAPB (11.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs NVDG's -66.19%.
On 1-year performance, AAPB leads with 106.72% vs 83.14% for NVDG. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AAPB has been the lower-risk option at 11.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPB has performed better with a 106.72% return vs 83.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AAPB.
NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.93%, compared with 3.55% for AAPB.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AAPB and 0.75% for NVDG.
AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPB and NVDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer