PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPB vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AAPB vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AAPB vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a -14.27% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.


AAPB

1D
1.85%
1M
-7.60%
YTD
-14.27%
6M
-4.96%
1Y
11.04%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
10Y*

NRGU

1D
-10.75%
1M
24.81%
YTD
139.49%
6M
107.68%
1Y
69.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAPB vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AAPB vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPB
AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPB vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPBNRGUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.18

0.79

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

1.48

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.21

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

1.29

-1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.71

2.64

-1.92

AAPB vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPB Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPB and NRGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPBNRGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.79

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.61

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between AAPB and NRGU is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AAPB vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
5.13%4.39%0.00%18.75%
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AAPB vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, roughly equal to the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and NRGU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPBNRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.13%

-57.50%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.56%

-55.24%

+13.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.96%

-17.40%

-5.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.84%

-25.38%

+5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.87%

27.12%

-10.25%

Volatility

AAPB vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is 11.08%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 23.31%. This indicates that AAPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AAPBNRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.08%

23.31%

-12.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.40%

50.27%

-19.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.81%

88.18%

-25.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.55%

87.12%

-35.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.55%

87.12%

-35.57%