AAPB vs. IFED

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED).

AAPB and IFED are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AAPB is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. IFED is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Sep 14, 2021.

Performance

AAPB vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AAPB vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	-15.83%	-0.93%	47.02%	77.21%	-38.44%
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN	-10.70%	15.02%	23.04%	20.78%	-1.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a -15.83% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -10.70% return.

AAPB

• 1D: 5.22%
• 1M: -8.53%
• YTD: -15.83%
• 6M: -5.94%
• 1Y: 10.00%
• 3Y*: 13.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IFED

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: -5.98%
• YTD: -10.70%
• 6M: -11.02%
• 1Y: 5.41%
• 3Y*: 14.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPB vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.

AAPB

GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF

IFED

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN

Return for Risk

AAPB vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPB

AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 21
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 26
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 19

IFED

IFED Risk / Return Rank: 20
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 20
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPB vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAPB	IFED	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	0.29	-0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	0.52	+0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.07	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	0.39	-0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.85	1.24	-0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAPB vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPB Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPB and IFED, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAPB	IFED	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	0.29	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.58	-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between AAPB and IFED is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AAPB vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	5.22%	4.39%	0.00%	18.75%
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AAPB vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and IFED.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPB	IFED	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.13%	-22.36%	-35.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.56%	-14.65%	-26.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.36%	-12.52%	-11.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.83%	-5.70%	-14.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.81%	4.64%	+12.17%

Volatility

AAPB vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.91%. This indicates that AAPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPB	IFED	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.86%	4.91%	+5.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.34%	10.83%	+19.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.90%	18.80%	+44.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.57%	19.72%	+31.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.57%	19.72%	+31.85%