AAPB vs. IFED

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AAPB is actively managed, while IFED is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAPB returned 20.30%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for IFED. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAPB charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.

Performance

AAPB vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's 6.57% return.

AAPB

• 1D: -3.56%
• 1M: -5.29%
• 6M: 16.59%
• YTD: 13.81%
• 1Y: 96.58%
• 3Y*: 20.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.96%

IFED

• 1D: -3.14%
• 1M: 10.34%
• 6M: 10.05%
• YTD: 6.57%
• 1Y: 11.16%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	$4.65M	$3.84M	$2.80M
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN	$137.39K	$84.48K	$45.67K

AAPB vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	13.81%	-0.93%	47.02%	77.21%	-38.60%
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN	6.57%	15.02%	23.04%	20.78%	-2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPB and IFED is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between AAPB and IFED has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AAPB vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAPB

AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 75
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 63

IFED

IFED Risk / Return Rank: 22
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 27
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAPB vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPB	IFED	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	0.38	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	0.75	+1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.13	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	0.56	+2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.86	1.73	+6.13

AAPB vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPB and IFED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAPB vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and IFED.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPB	IFED	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.13%	-22.36%	-35.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.11%	-20.18%	-7.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.13%	-22.36%	-35.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.15%	-10.51%	-10.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.90%	-5.85%	-13.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.33%	6.47%	+5.86%

Volatility

AAPB vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is 22.11%, while ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) has a volatility of 24.37%. This indicates that AAPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPB	IFED	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.11%	24.37%	-2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.82%	28.13%	+14.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.44%	29.53%	+22.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.52%	22.60%	+29.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.52%	22.60%	+29.92%

AAPB vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPB vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	3.86%	4.39%	0.00%	18.75%
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPB and IFED in my portfolio?

AAPB and IFED have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPB or IFED?

IFED has higher volatility (24.37%) compared to AAPB (22.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs IFED's -22.36%.

Which ETF is better, AAPB or IFED?

On 3-year performance, AAPB leads with 20.30% vs 18.28% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, AAPB has been the lower-risk option at 22.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPB or IFED?

Over the 3-year period, AAPB has performed better with a 20.30% return vs 18.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPB or IFED?

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AAPB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPB or IFED?

AAPB has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

What is the main difference between AAPB and IFED?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AAPB and 0.45% for IFED.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.