AAMI vs. MANH
AAMI (Acadian Asset Management Inc) and MANH (Manhattan Associates, Inc.) are both stocks. AAMI operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while MANH operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, AAMI returned 28.46%/yr vs 3.69%/yr for MANH. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AAMI vs. MANH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAMI achieves a 84.63% return, which is significantly higher than MANH's 10.41% return.
AAMI
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- 18.33%
- 6M
- 56.58%
- YTD
- 84.63%
- 1Y
- 119.33%
- 3Y*
- 59.37%
- 5Y*
- 28.46%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.06%
MANH
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 26.69%
- 6M
- 26.72%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- -10.85%
- 3Y*
- -0.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.36M | $34.64M | $36.97M | |
| $192.14M | $150.10M | $107.01M |
AAMI vs. MANH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMI Acadian Asset Management Inc | 84.63% | 78.64% | 37.70% | -6.72% | -19.45% | 33.00% | 93.85% | -0.80% | -30.71% |
MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 10.41% | -35.87% | 25.51% | 77.36% | -21.92% | 47.83% | 31.89% | 88.22% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAMI and MANH is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between AAMI and MANH shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AAMI:
$3.08B
MANH:
$11.32B
AAMI:
$2.83
MANH:
$3.49
AAMI:
30.51
MANH:
54.88
AAMI:
4.38
MANH:
10.24
AAMI:
33.56
MANH:
72.31
AAMI:
$706.40M
MANH:
$1.13B
AAMI:
$794.80M
MANH:
$301.44M
AAMI:
$198.00M
MANH:
$290.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAMI vs. MANH — Risk / Return Rank
AAMI
MANH
AAMI vs. MANH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) and Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAMI | MANH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.99 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | -0.29 | +6.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.01 | -0.47 | +15.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAMI vs. MANH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAMI drawdown since its inception was -75.23%, smaller than the maximum MANH drawdown of -87.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMI and MANH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAMI | MANH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.23% | -87.04% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.20% | -45.10% | +26.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.47% | -60.98% | +33.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.45% | -60.98% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -38.23% | +38.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -39.54% | +19.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 27.44% | -20.23% |
Volatility
AAMI vs. MANH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) is 12.38%, while Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) has a volatility of 24.18%. This indicates that AAMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MANH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAMI | MANH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.38% | 24.18% | -11.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.39% | 40.82% | -10.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.68% | 46.73% | -4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.31% | 39.92% | -4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.19% | 40.28% | +1.91% |
Dividends
AAMI vs. MANH - Dividend Comparison
AAMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while MANH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMI Acadian Asset Management Inc | 0.25% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.21% | 0.19% | 0.16% | 1.19% | 3.91% | 2.81% |
MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AAMI vs. MANH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acadian Asset Management Inc and Manhattan Associates, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AAMI vs. MANH - Profitability Comparison
AAMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a gross profit of 184.10M and revenue of 192.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.7%.
MANH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a gross profit of -155.57M and revenue of 297.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -52.2%.
AAMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported an operating income of 39.60M and revenue of 192.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.
MANH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported an operating income of 66.23M and revenue of 297.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.
AAMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a net income of 27.30M and revenue of 192.30M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.
MANH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a net income of 50.35M and revenue of 297.79M, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AAMI and MANH have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MANH has higher volatility (24.18%) compared to AAMI (12.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAMI dropped -75.23% vs MANH's -87.04%.
AAMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAMI and MANH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer