PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAMI vs. MITSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAMI vs. MITSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) and Mitsui & Company Ltd (MITSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAMI achieves a 57.73% return, which is significantly higher than MITSY's 0.23% return.


AAMI

1D
-1.68%
1M
3.36%
YTD
57.73%
6M
53.99%
1Y
134.32%
3Y*
54.11%
5Y*
25.65%
10Y*

MITSY

1D
-0.22%
1M
-16.29%
YTD
0.23%
6M
1.34%
1Y
46.31%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
21.65%
10Y*
18.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAMI vs. MITSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AAMI
Acadian Asset Management Inc
57.73%78.64%37.70%-6.72%-19.45%33.00%93.85%-0.80%-30.71%
MITSY
Mitsui & Company Ltd
0.23%43.31%13.10%28.00%23.12%28.70%4.06%14.13%-8.67%

Correlation

The correlation between AAMI and MITSY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAMI:

$2.65B

MITSY:

$83.68B

EPS

AAMI:

$2.35

MITSY:

¥5.90K

PE Ratio

AAMI:

31.44

MITSY:

16.10

PS Ratio

AAMI:

4.13

MITSY:

0.96

PB Ratio

AAMI:

34.13

MITSY:

1.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAMI:

$641.50M

MITSY:

¥14.19T

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAMI:

$652.90M

MITSY:

¥1.35T

EBITDA (TTM)

AAMI:

$185.00M

MITSY:

¥1.01T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAMI vs. MITSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAMI
AAMI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AAMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AAMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MITSY
MITSY Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MITSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITSY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
MITSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITSY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAMI vs. MITSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) and Mitsui & Company Ltd (MITSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAMIMITSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.26

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.42

1.67

+5.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.97

6.01

+13.95

AAMI vs. MITSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAMI Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the MITSY Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAMI and MITSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAMI vs. MITSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAMI drawdown since its inception was -75.23%, which is greater than MITSY's maximum drawdown of -44.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMI and MITSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAMIMITSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.23%

-44.45%

-30.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.20%

-27.89%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.63%

-33.95%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.45%

-33.95%

-17.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.67%

-27.89%

+17.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.58%

-16.09%

-4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.75%

7.72%

-0.97%

Volatility

AAMI vs. MITSY - Volatility Comparison

Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) has a higher volatility of 14.57% compared to Mitsui & Company Ltd (MITSY) at 9.35%. This indicates that AAMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MITSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAMIMITSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.57%

9.35%

+5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.41%

24.14%

+4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.21%

30.80%

+10.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.88%

29.67%

+5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.19%

26.76%

+15.43%

Dividends

AAMI vs. MITSY - Dividend Comparison

AAMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, while MITSY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AAMI
Acadian Asset Management Inc
0.30%0.09%0.15%0.21%0.19%0.16%1.19%3.91%2.81%0.00%0.00%
MITSY
Mitsui & Company Ltd
0.00%1.17%1.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.65%3.82%

Financials

AAMI vs. MITSY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acadian Asset Management Inc and Mitsui & Company Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T20222023202420252026
167.10M
3.71T
(AAMI) Total Revenue
(MITSY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AAMI values in USD, MITSY values in JPY

AAMI vs. MITSY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acadian Asset Management Inc and Mitsui & Company Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.3%
9.9%
Portfolio components
AAMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a gross profit of 159.30M and revenue of 167.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.

MITSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui & Company Ltd reported a gross profit of 368.30B and revenue of 3.71T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.9%.

AAMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported an operating income of 42.00M and revenue of 167.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.

MITSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui & Company Ltd reported an operating income of 106.13B and revenue of 3.71T, resulting in an operating margin of 2.9%.

AAMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a net income of 24.30M and revenue of 167.10M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.

MITSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui & Company Ltd reported a net income of 226.10B and revenue of 3.71T, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAMI and MITSY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAMI has higher volatility (14.57%) compared to MITSY (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAMI dropped -75.23% vs MITSY's -44.45%.

AAMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAMI and MITSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer