AAMBX vs. TMAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX).
AAMBX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Dec 2, 1976. TMAAX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005.
Performance
AAMBX vs. TMAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAMBX vs. TMAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund | -0.53% | 3.39% | 2.70% | 6.18% | -10.93% | 1.99% | 4.78% | 7.38% | 0.32% | 4.47% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | -2.02% | 15.13% | 19.29% | 17.06% | -17.79% | 15.74% | 14.13% | 21.47% | -6.30% | 11.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAMBX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly higher than TMAAX's -2.02% return. Over the past 10 years, AAMBX has underperformed TMAAX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while TMAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.97% annualized return.
AAMBX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
TMAAX
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- -2.02%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAMBX vs. TMAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAMBX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAAX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AAMBX vs. TMAAX — Risk / Return Rank
AAMBX
TMAAX
AAMBX vs. TMAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAMBX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 1.09 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 1.61 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.24 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.58 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.79 | 7.30 | -5.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAMBX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 1.09 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.55 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.68 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.43 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAMBX and TMAAX is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
AAMBX vs. TMAAX - Dividend Comparison
AAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than TMAAX's 7.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund | 3.54% | 4.65% | 3.93% | 2.58% | 2.97% | 2.66% | 2.80% | 3.35% | 3.45% | 3.40% | 3.41% | 3.39% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | 7.44% | 7.29% | 11.82% | 3.55% | 3.03% | 6.94% | 4.16% | 6.27% | 6.01% | 1.10% | 0.99% | 0.76% |
Drawdowns
AAMBX vs. TMAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAMBX drawdown since its inception was -49.18%, roughly equal to the maximum TMAAX drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMBX and TMAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAMBX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.18% | -50.54% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.89% | -9.88% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.17% | -26.55% | +10.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.17% | -26.99% | +10.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -5.44% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -7.41% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.15% | +0.05% |
Volatility
AAMBX vs. TMAAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) is 1.42%, while Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that AAMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAMBX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 4.83% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.02% | 7.98% | -5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.12% | 14.13% | -8.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 13.85% | -9.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.40% | 13.29% | -8.89% |