AAIZX vs. STK
AAIZX (Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z) and STK (Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAIZX returned 63.75% vs 101.51% for STK. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAIZX charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for STK.
Performance
AAIZX vs. STK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAIZX achieves a 28.62% return, which is significantly lower than STK's 50.97% return.
AAIZX
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 28.62%
- 6M
- 27.00%
- 1Y
- 63.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STK
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 50.97%
- 6M
- 51.80%
- 1Y
- 101.51%
- 3Y*
- 35.40%
- 5Y*
- 20.51%
- 10Y*
- 24.48%
AAIZX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AAIZX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z | 28.62% | 41.00% | 33.76% |
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 50.97% | 24.85% | 15.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAIZX and STK is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2024 | 0.75 |
The correlation between AAIZX and STK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAIZX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank
AAIZX
STK
AAIZX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z (AAIZX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAIZX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.63 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 6.36 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.68 | 27.27 | -16.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAIZX vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAIZX drawdown since its inception was -29.00%, smaller than the maximum STK drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAIZX and STK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAIZX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.00% | -41.74% | +12.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.47% | -16.05% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.70% | +5.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -7.41% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 3.74% | +2.10% |
Volatility
AAIZX vs. STK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z (AAIZX) is 9.98%, while Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) has a volatility of 14.95%. This indicates that AAIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAIZX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.98% | 14.95% | -4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.79% | 22.71% | -3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.92% | 26.39% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 25.75% | +2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 26.46% | +1.37% |
AAIZX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAIZX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAIZX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison
AAIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than STK's 4.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAIZX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z | 4.91% | 6.31% | 4.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 4.99% | 7.38% | 16.02% | 6.70% | 12.62% | 8.48% | 6.79% | 7.86% | 14.88% | 11.82% | 9.87% | 10.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAIZX and STK have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STK has higher volatility (14.95%) compared to AAIZX (9.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAIZX dropped -29.00% vs STK's -41.74%.
STK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAIZX and STK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer