PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAIZX vs. CCOYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AAIZX vs. CCOYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z (AAIZX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AAIZX vs. CCOYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAIZX achieves a -7.82% return, which is significantly lower than CCOYX's 5.84% return.


AAIZX

1D
4.88%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
-7.82%
6M
-10.37%
1Y
46.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CCOYX

1D
5.58%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
5.84%
6M
9.67%
1Y
65.81%
3Y*
32.08%
5Y*
17.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAIZX vs. CCOYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAIZX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOYX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AAIZX vs. CCOYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAIZX
AAIZX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AAIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AAIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOYX
CCOYX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CCOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAIZX vs. CCOYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z (AAIZX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAIZXCCOYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

2.19

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

2.77

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

4.50

-1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.16

17.02

-8.86

AAIZX vs. CCOYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAIZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the CCOYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAIZX and CCOYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAIZXCCOYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.19

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.85

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between AAIZX and CCOYX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AAIZX vs. CCOYX - Dividend Comparison

AAIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, less than CCOYX's 7.63% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAIZX
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z
6.85%6.31%4.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCOYX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class
7.63%8.08%12.32%4.60%8.17%10.62%9.52%10.61%11.42%10.60%

Drawdowns

AAIZX vs. CCOYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAIZX drawdown since its inception was -29.00%, smaller than the maximum CCOYX drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAIZX and CCOYX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AAIZXCCOYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.00%

-37.16%

+8.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.47%

-14.88%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.44%

-7.00%

-6.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-7.81%

+2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

3.94%

+1.85%

Volatility

AAIZX vs. CCOYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z (AAIZX) is 9.48%, while Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX) has a volatility of 11.14%. This indicates that AAIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCOYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AAIZXCCOYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.48%

11.14%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.87%

21.67%

-3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.91%

31.00%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.99%

26.06%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.99%

26.75%

+1.24%