PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAHTX vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAHTX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2045 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAHTX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAHTX achieves a 10.14% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, AAHTX has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 11.86%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.61% annualized return.


AAHTX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.45%
YTD
10.14%
6M
10.80%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
11.86%

VONG

1D
-1.32%
1M
5.68%
YTD
7.17%
6M
6.52%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
15.38%
10Y*
18.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAHTX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAHTX
American Funds 2045 Target Date Retirement Fund
10.14%20.01%14.82%19.74%-18.40%16.83%18.79%24.33%-5.92%22.02%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
7.17%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AAHTX and VONG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.90

The correlation between AAHTX and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAHTX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAHTX
AAHTX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AAHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AAHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAHTX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2045 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAHTX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAHTXVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

1.59

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.36

5.34

+7.02

AAHTX vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAHTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAHTX and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAHTXVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.68

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.72

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.89

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.90

-0.36

Drawdowns

AAHTX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAHTX drawdown since its inception was -50.05%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAHTX and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAHTXVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.05%

-32.72%

-17.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-16.23%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.49%

-23.27%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.83%

-32.72%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.92%

-32.72%

+3.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.66%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-4.88%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

4.83%

-2.80%

Volatility

AAHTX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds 2045 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAHTX) is 3.26%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that AAHTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAHTXVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.60%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

11.61%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.18%

15.37%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

21.33%

-7.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.59%

20.87%

-6.28%

AAHTX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAHTX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAHTX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

AAHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than VONG's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAHTX
American Funds 2045 Target Date Retirement Fund
5.31%5.85%3.37%2.46%6.75%4.62%3.19%4.24%4.85%2.33%3.50%4.74%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.43%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAHTX and VONG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VONG has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to AAHTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAHTX dropped -50.05% vs VONG's -32.72%.

AAHTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAHTX and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer