PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAEQ vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.


AAEQ

1D
-0.75%
1M
4.79%
YTD
8.91%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AAEQ
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF
8.91%-1.99%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%-1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between AAEQ and MTUM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.86

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AAEQ
MTUM

Technology

35.9%
44.4%

Financial Services

11.8%
10.4%

Communication Services

11.7%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
3.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
6.9%

Industrials

7.9%
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
3.3%

Energy

3.8%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.8%

Technology

AAEQ
35.9%
MTUM
44.4%

Financial Services

AAEQ
11.8%
MTUM
10.4%

Communication Services

AAEQ
11.7%
MTUM
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

AAEQ
10.3%
MTUM
3.6%

Healthcare

AAEQ
8.6%
MTUM
6.9%

Industrials

AAEQ
7.9%
MTUM
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

AAEQ
4.4%
MTUM
3.3%

Energy

AAEQ
3.8%
MTUM
3.5%

Utilities

AAEQ
2.4%
MTUM
1.6%

Basic Materials

AAEQ
1.7%
MTUM
1.7%

Real Estate

AAEQ
1.5%
MTUM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAEQ vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAEQ

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAEQMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.85

+0.24

Drawdowns

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAEQMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-34.08%

+23.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

0.00%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-6.21%

+3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

Volatility

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAEQMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

19.04%

-5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

20.60%

-6.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

21.03%

-7.31%

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AAEQ and MTUM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAEQ
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF
0.09%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAEQ and MTUM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAEQ and MTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.09% for AAEQ.

AAEQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAEQ and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer