AAEQ vs. MTUM
AAEQ (Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAEQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. AAEQ is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
AAEQ vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 21.46% return.
AAEQ
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- YTD
- 21.46%
- 1Y
- 28.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.55%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 15.89%
AAEQ vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAEQ Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF | 8.51% | -1.11% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 21.46% | -0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAEQ and MTUM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.79 |
AAEQ vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAEQ
MTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
AAEQ
MTUM
Communication Services
AAEQ
MTUM
Financial Services
AAEQ
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
AAEQ
MTUM
Healthcare
AAEQ
MTUM
Industrials
AAEQ
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
AAEQ
MTUM
Energy
AAEQ
MTUM
Real Estate
AAEQ
MTUM
Utilities
AAEQ
MTUM
Basic Materials
AAEQ
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAEQ vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
AAEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MTUM
AAEQ vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAEQ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAEQ vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAEQ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.26% | -34.08% | +23.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -12.11% | +10.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -6.20% | +3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.51% | — |
Volatility
AAEQ vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAEQ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 24.08% | -10.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 21.61% | -7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 21.55% | -7.70% |
AAEQ vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AAEQ and MTUM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AAEQ vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than MTUM's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAEQ Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.61% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAEQ and MTUM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAEQ and MTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.09% for AAEQ.
AAEQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares.
Find the right allocation for AAEQ and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer