PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAEQ vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 21.46% return.


AAEQ

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.30%
6M
7.61%
YTD
8.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTUM

1D
-2.96%
1M
-6.94%
6M
18.20%
YTD
21.46%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
28.55%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
15.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AAEQ
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF
8.51%-1.11%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
21.46%-0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AAEQ and MTUM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.79

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AAEQ
MTUM

Technology

40.5%
50.2%

Communication Services

12.2%
5.1%

Financial Services

11.6%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
2.9%

Healthcare

9.0%
3.5%

Industrials

6.1%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
3.7%

Energy

2.9%
10.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.3%

Utilities

1.5%
0.6%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.3%

Technology

AAEQ
40.5%
MTUM
50.2%

Communication Services

AAEQ
12.2%
MTUM
5.1%

Financial Services

AAEQ
11.6%
MTUM
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

AAEQ
9.1%
MTUM
2.9%

Healthcare

AAEQ
9.0%
MTUM
3.5%

Industrials

AAEQ
6.1%
MTUM
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

AAEQ
4.5%
MTUM
3.7%

Energy

AAEQ
2.9%
MTUM
10.5%

Real Estate

AAEQ
1.6%
MTUM
1.3%

Utilities

AAEQ
1.5%
MTUM
0.6%

Basic Materials

AAEQ
1.1%
MTUM
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAEQ vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAEQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAEQMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAEQMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-34.08%

+23.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-12.11%

+10.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-6.20%

+3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

Volatility

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAEQMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

24.08%

-10.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

21.61%

-7.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.85%

21.55%

-7.70%

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AAEQ and MTUM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AAEQ vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than MTUM's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAEQ
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF
0.09%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.61%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAEQ and MTUM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAEQ and MTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.09% for AAEQ.

AAEQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAEQ and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer