PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAEQ vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAEQ vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.


AAEQ

1D
-0.75%
1M
4.79%
YTD
8.91%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAEQ vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAEQ and FNDX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.73

AAEQ vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AAEQ
FNDX

Technology

35.9%
19.1%

Financial Services

11.8%
14.1%

Communication Services

11.7%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
9.2%

Healthcare

8.6%
12.0%

Industrials

7.9%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
7.4%

Energy

3.8%
10.3%

Utilities

2.4%
3.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.8%

Technology

AAEQ
35.9%
FNDX
19.1%

Financial Services

AAEQ
11.8%
FNDX
14.1%

Communication Services

AAEQ
11.7%
FNDX
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

AAEQ
10.3%
FNDX
9.2%

Healthcare

AAEQ
8.6%
FNDX
12.0%

Industrials

AAEQ
7.9%
FNDX
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

AAEQ
4.4%
FNDX
7.4%

Energy

AAEQ
3.8%
FNDX
10.3%

Utilities

AAEQ
2.4%
FNDX
3.2%

Basic Materials

AAEQ
1.7%
FNDX
3.7%

Real Estate

AAEQ
1.5%
FNDX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAEQ vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAEQ

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAEQ vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAEQ vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAEQFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.79

+0.29

Drawdowns

AAEQ vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAEQFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-37.72%

+27.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.13%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-3.55%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

Volatility

AAEQ vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAEQFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

10.22%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

15.18%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

17.50%

-3.78%

AAEQ vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAEQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AAEQ vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAEQ
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF
0.09%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAEQ and FNDX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAEQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAEQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.09% for AAEQ.

AAEQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAEQ and 0.25% for FNDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAEQ and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer