AAEQ vs. BBUS
AAEQ (Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AAEQ is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AAEQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
AAEQ vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 7.68% return.
AAEQ
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
AAEQ vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAEQ Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF | 5.63% | -1.11% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 7.68% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAEQ and BBUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.99 |
AAEQ vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAEQ
BBUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
AAEQ
BBUS
Communication Services
AAEQ
BBUS
Financial Services
AAEQ
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
AAEQ
BBUS
Healthcare
AAEQ
BBUS
Industrials
AAEQ
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
AAEQ
BBUS
Energy
AAEQ
BBUS
Real Estate
AAEQ
BBUS
Utilities
AAEQ
BBUS
Basic Materials
AAEQ
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAEQ vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
AAEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBUS
AAEQ vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAEQ | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAEQ vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAEQ | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.26% | -35.35% | +25.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -3.37% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -5.43% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
AAEQ vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAEQ | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.27% | 12.53% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 17.13% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 19.59% | -5.32% |
AAEQ vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAEQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AAEQ vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than BBUS's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAEQ Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, AAEQ and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AAEQ.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.09% for AAEQ.
They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAEQ and 0.02% for BBUS.
Find the right allocation for AAEQ and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer