AADR vs. YOLO
AADR (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF) and YOLO (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AADR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while YOLO is a Cannabis fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AADR returned 6.23%/yr vs -31.60%/yr for YOLO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AADR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for YOLO.
Performance
AADR vs. YOLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AADR achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly higher than YOLO's -11.82% return.
AADR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 9.54%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
YOLO
- 1D
- -5.83%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- YTD
- -11.82%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 48.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- -31.60%
- 10Y*
- —
AADR vs. YOLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | -1.56% | 25.63% | 24.58% | 18.67% | -22.93% | 6.48% | 13.13% | 19.22% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | -11.82% | 36.36% | -17.81% | -15.10% | -72.21% | -20.48% | 47.17% | -50.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between AADR and YOLO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019 | 0.41 |
The correlation between AADR and YOLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AADR vs. YOLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AADR
YOLO
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
AADR
YOLO
Basic Materials
AADR
YOLO
-
Financial Services
AADR
YOLO
Industrials
AADR
YOLO
-
Technology
AADR
YOLO
-
Energy
AADR
YOLO
-
Communication Services
AADR
YOLO
-
Utilities
AADR
YOLO
-
Consumer Cyclical
AADR
YOLO
Consumer Defensive
AADR
YOLO
Real Estate
AADR
-
YOLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AADR vs. YOLO — Risk / Return Rank
AADR
YOLO
AADR vs. YOLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AADR | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.19 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 1.19 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | 2.23 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AADR | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.65 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | -0.59 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | -0.48 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
AADR vs. YOLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, smaller than the maximum YOLO drawdown of -94.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and YOLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AADR | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.01% | -94.68% | +49.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.30% | -41.09% | +21.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.61% | -66.45% | +45.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.80% | -92.47% | +57.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.54% | -89.68% | +77.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -68.94% | +59.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 21.83% | -15.01% |
Volatility
AADR vs. YOLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) is 6.34%, while AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that AADR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YOLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AADR | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 12.79% | -6.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.55% | 52.52% | -34.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 74.56% | -53.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 53.64% | -31.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 51.36% | -29.16% |
AADR vs. YOLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than YOLO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AADR vs. YOLO - Dividend Comparison
AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while YOLO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | 0.54% | 0.49% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 3.65% | 0.92% | 0.11% | 0.58% | 0.75% | 0.74% | 0.58% | 0.81% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.57% | 1.17% | 0.55% | 3.93% | 2.03% | 4.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AADR and YOLO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YOLO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to AADR (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADR dropped -45.01% vs YOLO's -94.68%.
On 5-year performance, AADR leads with 6.23% vs -31.60% for YOLO. On fees, YOLO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AADR has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AADR has performed better with a 6.23% return vs -31.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YOLO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for AADR.
AADR has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for YOLO.
AADR is categorized as Global Equities, while YOLO is Cannabis. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 0.75% for YOLO.
YOLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AADR and YOLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer